AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ioana Voiculescu

MATH118 · MATH120 · MATH164 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle a and are willing to study consistently for relatively manageable tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy tests if you studyRude toneHeavy accentBoring lecturesFair grading
  • Tests are often manageable when students study and do the homework.
  • Many students complain about rude interactions, unclear English, cursive handwriting, and boring lectures.
  • Homework and , but as fair or slightly easy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with and studying, but students do not describe it as effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The math content is generally manageable, but lectures, accent, handwriting, and .

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person MATH120 and MATH164 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students repeatedly say skipping class hurts performance and she never misses or releases class early.

, and they portray it as important and inflexible.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

a rude, boring style in exchange for fair and study-based tests.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person, with strongly mixed comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and and studying are completed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

and sometimes frequent, but most students do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

51/100

, but many reviews cite rude behavior, boring lectures, accent issues, handwriting problems, and mistakes.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and consistently mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Grades appear driven by several exams and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

instructor whose tests are usually fair if students study and keep up with homework.

Main concern

Students often struggle with her accent, handwriting, and limited patience with questions.

What students said

“ if you study, just STUDY”
MATH120
“Boring but easy.”
MATH120
“ . .”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

find easy if they study, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policies.

Multiple ExamsFinal ExamTests Similar To Studied MaterialNo Makeup Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

63/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests that are easy with studying, but they do not clearly prove book, camera, or proctoring rules.

Four ExamsFinal ExamEasy If You StudyNo Makeup Test Mentioned
“4 exams worth 60 points and a final worth 80.”
MATH120
“ if you study”
MATH120
“Does .”
MATH118

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Boring but easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom friction. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

51/100

“i love the ”

📈 Grade Value

68/100

“ if you study, just STUDY”

⚠️ Classroom Friction

35/100

“Strong Accent, writes cursive, does not answer students questions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Writes every step on board
  • Lectures can put you to sleep

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Boring but easy.
  • she grades very fairly for the most part
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • she is rude, never likes to answer questions
  • Hand writing is horrible, cursive only
  • . .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years give consistent , and exams, though most are older.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1209 reviews
MATH1642 reviews
MATH1181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values