AI Rate Professor

Speech

E Pippins

SPCH121 · SPCH120 · SPCOM124 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are highly independent and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedStrict AttendanceUnfairExtra Credit Mentioned
  • , and two are very old and negative.
  • The strongest comment describes the class as , and chronically late.
  • Attendance appears strict, but there .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A does not look easy because and the strongest review calls the class unfair.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The , but ratings suggest moderate difficulty rather than an easy course.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One review directly warns that skipping class means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The strongest detailed review says to stay away due to disrespect, lateness, disorganization, and unfairness.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Grading evidence is thin, but the unfairness complaint and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The reviews do not clearly describe workload volume, so workload should be treated as unknown to moderate.

Format shift

, and they give little workload detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The most detailed review describes disruptive, disrespectful, late, and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person and mostly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether .

Format shift

Assessment and is too limited to separate methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but mostly negative, with concerns about organization, fairness, and .

Main concern

Students may face disorganization and .

What students said

“Terrible! Disruptive, disrespectful.”
SPCOM124
“ .”
SPCOM124
“Helpful”
SPCH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible! Disruptive, disrespectful. Late to start class, late ending class ... Chronically! . Stay away from this teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and expectations. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ .”

⚠️

15/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

25/100

“Stay away from this teacher!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Helpful
  • Terrible! Disruptive, disrespectful.
  • .

Theme 2

📌 About Class Expectations

  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only three reviews, two are old, and most comments lack detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SPCH1201 review
SPCH1211 review
SPCOM1241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values