AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rosie Zin

MATH118 · MATH120 · MATH115 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can learn independently and are willing to seek help outside lecture.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandCaring for Motivated StudentsTest HeavyAttendance MattersMixed Teaching Quality
  • Reviews and serious communication problems.
  • Several in-person students report a heavy accent, frustration with questions, and .
  • The single online review is positive, while most .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students earned A grades and , but , and unclear teaching make the A require real effort.

Online evidence is positive and easier, while and serious struggle.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Math content becomes harder because lectures are often described as , and difficult to understand.

The one , but most in-person reviews describe confusion and communication problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Multiple in-person tags warn that skipping class can cause failure, even though one review says she may not care about lateness.

; the online review does not address attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendations depend heavily on the student because motivated students praise her care while many others warn against taking her.

The online review recommends her, while and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Make-up work and several A grades suggest some leniency, but and .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is positive but thin, while and tough-grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Reviews mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Workload ; the online review does not describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

She is caring for motivated students, but repeated complaints about clarity, accent, mistakes, and frustration lower teaching quality.

Format shift

The online review says she explains well, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Several comments and tags point to tests as a .

Format shift

; the online review does not describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but often warn about unclear lectures, a , and frustration when students ask for clarification.

Main concern

Many students struggled to understand lectures and felt questions were not handled patiently.

What students said

“Very thick accent! It is very difficult to understand what she is teaching.”
MATH118
“She allows make up work to get a .”
MATH118
“Very hard to understand, thick accent.”
MATH118

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The only online review is positive and , and .

Main concern

There is only one online review, so confidence is low.

What students said

“ and caring.”
MATH115
“ .”
MATH115

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because , and tests on material students say was not taught.

Test HeavyTough GradingUnclear Exam PreparationReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support a and unclear exam preparation, but do not prove open-book status or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyTough GradingUnclear Exam Preparation
“ yet”
MATH118
“Very hard to understand, thick accent.”
MATH118
“She makes ALOT of mistakes in class as well in the test score.”
MATH115

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you really want to learn, I suggest taking math with a more patient professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting the split , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Very thick accent! It is very difficult to understand what she is teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Split

43/100

“ . She has heart!”

⚖️

52/100

“She allows make up work to get a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and caring.
  • Very thick accent! It is very difficult to understand what she is teaching.
  • and won't repeat or gets irritated.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She allows make up work to get a .
  • yet
  • Very hard to understand, thick accent.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She actually is pationate about math and .
  • Ms. Zin is a wonderful teacher who cares for the students that care about the class.
  • Ms. Zin heart was in the right place, however she lacks the confidence to really control a classroom.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years give useful pattern evidence, though the online sample has only one review and opinions conflict.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH1186 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
MATH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2