AI Rate Professor

Art

Wendy McDermott

ART117 · ART135 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedTough GraderUnclear ExpectationsEasy ContentHelpful In Demos
  • Students repeatedly describe her as late, scattered, and unorganized.
  • The class content can be easy, but and .
  • One older review says the class became supportive, but the overall recommendation tone is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

The class may be easy, but unclear expectations and effortless.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students call the class easy, though the content itself.

Only in-person reviews exist, so the ease rating reflects classroom comments only.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

One student , but missing initial demos was strongly discouraged.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

23/100

because they describe unprofessional behavior, disorganization, unclear expectations, and weak content delivery.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in-person, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students mention tough grading, low grades used to push students, high expectations, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload itself is not described as extreme, but and expectations add friction.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Most reviews criticize her organization, professionalism, clarity, and command of the material.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus on grades, demos, and studio expectations rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe easy course content but , and a frustrating classroom experience.

Main concern

The main concern is unclear, disorganized teaching with high expectations and low student trust.

What students said

“Is usually tardy and unprofessional.”
ART117
“late and unorganized.”
ART117
“Easy class if you can ignore the distractions she imposes”
ART117

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Exam Policy Not Clear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“late and unorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“late and unorganized.”

⚖️

28/100

“ and demos.”

👍 Recommendation Level

23/100

“Has high expectations for everything but is not a great teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Is usually tardy and unprofessional.
  • Not computer literate and she is all over the place.
  • Goes on tangents.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Boring but easy class.
  • and demos.
  • Does have high expectations for students and gives students low grades to push them to do better.

Theme 3

🤝 About Helpfulness

  • She is glad to help you as much as she can.
  • the class became like a family and everyone worked together and learned a LOT!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

54/100

Evidence confidence

The rating has only 4 reviews across a long time span, but the negative themes about organization and clarity are consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1173 reviews
ART1351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values