AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Danny Martin

MATH118 · CISCO · MATH191 · MATH164STATS · MATH191MATH292 · MATH292 · MATH171 · MATH290 · MATH118190 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a strong math teacher and are willing to keep up with homework and fast-paced material.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturerVery HelpfulOrganizedChallenging But Worth ItStrongly Recommended
  • Students consistently describe Martin as , and life-changing for math confidence.
  • The courses are not effortless, but students say , and asking questions make success realistic.
  • All , so confidence is limited by age despite strong consistency.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Getting an A appears realistic with , and participation, but students do not describe it as effortless.

The .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The , but several math courses cover substantial material quickly and are not easy.

The .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

as strictly mandatory, but students are encouraged to participate and ask questions in class.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students strongly recommend him because he teaches clearly, helps students, and improves their confidence in math.

The .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

as harsh or generous, and success and preparing.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Students mention , and preparation, but not an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

The .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Reviews repeatedly praise his clear lectures, organization, helpfulness, and ability to build student confidence.

Format shift

The .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a , but provide limited detail on grade weighting.

Format shift

The .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe Martin as , and demanding in a productive way.

Main concern

Some courses move quickly and and preparation.

What students said

“Very good at teaching. His class is not easy but after all students are better off.”
MATH191
“ . and very helpful.”
MATH171
“Good teacher, but difficult, covers a lot of material very quickly.”
MATH191MATH292

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and practice tests, but and proctoring are not clearly proven.

Practice Tests MentionedHomework Preparation HelpsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice tests, but do not clearly prove exam format rules.

Practice Tests MentionedTests Not Too BadPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ if you do the homework and .”
MATH171

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very good at teaching. His class is not easy but after all students are better off. !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ . and very helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

90/100

“Very good at teaching. His class is not easy but after all students are better off. !!”

📚 Effort Needed

52/100

“The class takes effort--do the homework and participate in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and knows his stuff.
  • With Calc I he really teaches it well and and understandable.
  • how to be a student.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His class is not easy but after all students are better off.
  • Good teacher, but difficult, covers a lot of material very quickly.
  • if you do the homework and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

The 9 reviews are detailed and consistent, but they are old and lack grade distribution data.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CISCO1 review
MATH1181 review
MATH1181901 review
MATH164STATS1 review
MATH1711 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1911 review
MATH191MATH2921 review
MATH2901 review
MATH2921 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values