AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Robbie Kunkel

PHILO130 · POLITICALSCIEN · PHILOETHICS · PHILO110 · CRITTHNK · HUM120 · PHIL110 · HUMAN120 · PHILO1104019 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want a supportive humanities or philosophy professor with and strong student care.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and kindClear explanationsHighly recommendedEasy testsAttendance matters
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Kunkel as , and inspiring.
  • The courses are usually low difficulty if students attend, study, and complete the work.
  • In-person reviews show easy tests and , while the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A seems very reachable with , and completing assignments, though the .

and easy tests, while the single online review says homework was intense.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Students say the material is understandable, thought-provoking, and generally not hard when approached with an open mind.

and , while the online review mainly flags workload rather than concept difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

as formally graded often, but students repeatedly imply showing up is important and one review says she does not mess around with it.

The ; the online review does not discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students recommend her enthusiastically because , and makes philosophy approachable.

The recommendation signal is overwhelmingly in-person, with the only online review also positive overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Tests are described as easy with study , and grades that reward basic preparation.

Format shift

, while online exams were easy but homework-heavy.

Workload

Light

78/100

, but the online review reports intense homework that took a lot of time.

Format shift

In-person workload looks light, while the single online class had a .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and one of their best teachers.

Format shift

Both formats are positive, but the and more consistent.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, , and class participation rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework, essays, and multiple-choice exams; , and study guides.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently praise her kindness, clarity, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“She doesn't mess around , so show up!”
PHILO130
“her way of and understandable.”
POLITICALSCIEN
“ if you just study the material.”
PHILO130

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online and short essays but .

Main concern

and intense.

What students said

“ and all based on the homework.”
PHILO130
“Only thing difficult was that the and intense.”
PHILO130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

provided material, though reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policies.

Multiple-Choice ExamsTests Based on HomeworkStudy GuidesDropped TestTrue-False Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or multiple-choice formats, and a dropped test option.

Easy TestsStudy GuidesDropped TestTrue-False TestsMultiple-Choice Tests
“ if you just study the material.”
PHILO130
“She gives you a study guide before every test and the .”
CRITTHNK
“you get .”
PHILO130

Online

The online review says exams were multiple choice and based on homework, but it .

Multiple-Choice ExamsTests Based on Homework
“ and all based on the homework.”
PHILO130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“YEAH FOR MS. K ! ! Engaging, interesting, I was introduced to philosophers on a level I could understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student care; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“her way of and understandable.”

👍 Recommendation Level

97/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

88/100

“study and you'll get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She created an air of understanding and learning.
  • She makes everything easier to understand.
  • Her delivery was enthusiastic as well as efficient.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you just study the material.
  • There is , but and one presentation.
  • Only thing difficult was that the and intense.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is passionate about philosophy and .
  • She is the sweetest woman!
  • Great caring teacher!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is based on 22 reviews across several years with highly consistent praise and repeated , and workload.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILO1308 reviews
PHILO1105 reviews
HUM1202 reviews
HUMAN1202 reviews
CRITTHNK1 review
Show 4 more courses
PHIL1101 review
PHILO11040191 review
PHILOETHICS1 review
POLITICALSCIEN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values