AI Rate Professor

Nursing

McClough Mary-Anne Warner

NURSING · NURS205 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you can tolerate uneven delivery and are willing to attend lectures and complete the workbook.

Best fit · Effort For RewardChallenging courseMixed teaching qualityHelpful when askedTechnical issues
  • Reviews are sharply split between one very negative technical experience and one very positive learning-focused experience.
  • The course is described as challenging, with .
  • Success depends on attending lecture, completing workbook work, and asking for help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A , and steady effort rather than easy points.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

One student directly says the class is challenging and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but one review says students really have to show up for lectures.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Recommendation is uncertain because comments range from calling the teacher useless to praising her effort to help students learn.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Reviews mention exams from workbook material but as .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload seems heavy because students are told to attend lecture and complete all workbook work for exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is highly mixed, with one review citing useless instruction and another praising her effort to help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The workbook material.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

technical problems and another describing strong help for a challenging course.

Main concern

Teaching quality appears inconsistent across the two reviews.

What students said

“Technical difficulties every class! Teacher is usless”
NURSING
“This teacher makes every effort to help you learn and get the material all you have to do is ask.”
NURS205

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly prove that exams are based on workbook material, with .

Workbook-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or .

Workbook-Based Exams
“complete all the work in the workbook because the ”
NURS205

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is challenging. You really have to show up for lectures and make sure you complete all the work in the workbook because the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“This teacher makes every effort to help you learn and get the material all you have to do is ask.”

⚠️ Course Risk

35/100

“Technical difficulties every class! Teacher is usless”

📚 Difficulty

32/100

“This class is challenging.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Technical difficulties every class! Teacher is usless
  • This teacher makes every effort to help you learn and get the material all you have to do is ask.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class is challenging.
  • You really have to show up for lectures and make sure you complete all the work in the workbook because the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

, and they strongly conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NURS2051 review
NURSING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values