AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Carmen McNeil-Jackson

PSYCH160 · PSYCH113 · CIS118 · PSYCHOLOGY118 · PSYCH140 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want a supportive, engaging psychology class with reasonable expectations.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPassionate LecturerSupportive TeacherComfortable DiscussionsLife-Relevant MaterialHighly Recommended
  • Students consistently describe her as , and caring.
  • The course feels manageable, with reasonable expectations and approachable teaching.
  • All , so confidence is limited by age despite strong consistency.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A seems manageable because students describe reasonable expectations, but there is not enough grade detail to call it effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course content appears approachable because students say and makes material relevant to life.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

because she is passionate, helpful, understanding, and makes class meaningful.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students describe reasonable expectations, but and grade outcomes are not clearly documented.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Workload appears light to moderate, with mentions of essays, quizzes, a report, and a final but no major complaints.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently praise her passion, clarity, kindness, and ability to create a comfortable learning environment.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and a final exam.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students strongly praise her passion, clarity, helpfulness, and comfortable classroom environment.

Main concern

The main limitation is that reviews are old and .

What students said

“She's great. I can tell she's passionate about what she lectures.”
PSYCH140
“ and her expectations for class is reasonable.”
PSYCH113

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and a , but do not clearly prove exam difficulty, book policy, or proctoring rules.

Final ExaminationPop QuizzesFinal Report

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final examination, but do not clearly prove the .

Pop QuizzesFinal Examination
“Pop quizzes, a and .”
PSYCH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is really great! and her expectations for class is reasonable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and classroom experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Her articulation is great.”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“ .”

⚖️ Course Manageability

82/100

“ and her expectations for class is reasonable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes lectures very interesting.
  • She teaches very well and the material is relevant to life.
  • Her articulation is great.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • , and very nice.
  • She appreciates all her students and the quility of life.
  • She makes it comfortable for everyone.

Theme 3

📚

  • Pop quizzes, a and .
  • her expectations for class is reasonable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

The five reviews are very consistent and detailed enough, but they are old and lack grade data.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS1181 review
PSYCH1131 review
PSYCH1401 review
PSYCH1601 review
PSYCHOLOGY1181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values