AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Donald Rupp

CIS · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable learning independently when lectures and technical setup fall short.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice but unclearTechnology issuesSelf-study requiredHelpful handouts
  • The student describes him as nice but ineffective in making lessons work with school computers.
  • Lectures were frustrating, and outside books and tutorials were needed to understand the material.
  • Handout notes helped somewhat, but not enough to make the course feel well taught.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

There is no grade evidence, and needing outside books and tutorials suggests earning a strong grade may require extra effort.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course may not be conceptually extreme, but and computer issues made it harder to learn.

Only in-person evidence exists and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The review is hesitant because the student found lectures frustrating and .

Recommendation evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

provided.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, but the need for outside tutorials added extra learning effort.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, with no online workload comparison.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

The student saw him as nice, but lectures were frustrating and required self-teaching to compensate.

Format shift

The only evidence is in-person and and technology problems.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review mentions handout notes but .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and assessment methods are not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The but struggled to deliver computer-based lessons effectively.

Main concern

The student had to rely on other books and tutorials to understand the material.

What students said

“Nice teacher but being new Professor Rupp had difficulty figuring out how to make his lessons work with the school's computers.”
CIS
“The only way I was able to figure things out was looking at other books and tutorials.”
CIS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The only way I was able to figure things out was looking at other books and tutorials.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and learning support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Therefore it was frustrating sitting through his lectures.”

📚

45/100

“The only way I was able to figure things out was looking at other books and tutorials.”

📝 Course Support

50/100

“However his handout notes helped some.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Nice teacher but being new Professor Rupp had difficulty figuring out how to make his lessons work with the school's computers.
  • Therefore it was frustrating sitting through his lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Learning Difficulty

  • The only way I was able to figure things out was looking at other books and tutorials.
  • However his handout notes helped some.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the evidence is narrow and not very reliable.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values