AI Rate Professor

English

Jamie Anderson

ENG3A · ENG003A5030 · ENG003 · 3A · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you are willing to write often, revise carefully, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed FeedbackWriting IntensiveHigh ExpectationsSupportiveRevision Friendly
  • She is widely seen as supportive and writing.
  • The course is writing-heavy, reading-heavy, and can .
  • Revision opportunities and to do sustained work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

A grades are common because revisions and , but students repeatedly say she makes you work for the grade.

Online evidence strongly supports revision-based earning, while the putting in work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The content is manageable but intellectually demanding because , and polished writing.

Online reviews emphasize accelerated pacing and heavy papers, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Reviews emphasize participation and discussion, but they do not clearly prove a .

Online reviews mention discussion boards and participation, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her because her expectations are high but and support help students improve.

Online evidence is mostly positive with one strong warning, while the but workload-aware.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Resubmissions and , but she is not lenient without effort.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest evidence for revision opportunities, while if you do not work.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly , and an accelerated workload.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavy, while the .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most reviews , and commitment to student writing growth despite one harsh negative review.

Format shift

Online reviews show strong teaching support with one major dissent, while the as caring and clear.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

and discussions, while in-person evidence also focuses on participation and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review says she cares and , but participation and .

Main concern

There is , so format-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“Lots of , but its an English class so what do you expect.”
ENG3A

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe a demanding but , and revision opportunities.

Main concern

The online workload can feel intense, especially the frequent essays and readings.

What students said

“She gives a ton of feedback to help you improve your writing and ”
ENG3A
“This was an accelerated class that was certainly challenging and a lot of work.”
ENG003A5030
“You have to write a ton of essay and she .”
3A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, .

No Clear Exam EvidenceEssay HeavyDiscussion Boards

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single in-person review mentions participation and papers but .

Papers MentionedParticipation GradedNo Clear Exam Evidence
“Grade for participation and if you listen to the lectures.”
ENG3A

Online

Online reviews discuss essays, readings, and discussion boards, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Essay HeavyDiscussion BoardsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“There will be a .”
ENG003A5030
“You and be required to participate in a discussion board.”
ENG003A5030

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has high expectations but is there every step of the way to help you through.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She has high expectations but is there every step of the way to help you through.”

📈 Grade Path

70/100

“allows you to resubmit essays to get a better grade which makes it easy to get an A if you want it.”

📝 Workload Reality

25/100

“This was an accelerated class that was certainly challenging and a lot of work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares about students' success, explains everything in detail, and .
  • She gives a ton of
  • Loved her communication and .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There will be a .
  • Heavy on the paper writing, but she builds great writers.
  • You have to write a ton of essay

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Improvement

  • gives you a chance to submit a better essay if needed.
  • She definitely makes you work for your grade with essays and reading assignments
  • if you don't put in the work she wont give you many buffers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 8 reviews with detailed comments, but the and opinions include one strong outlier.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG3A5 reviews
3A1 review
ENG0031 review
ENG003A50301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values