AI Rate Professor

History

Jonathan Dunn

HIST017 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you like history writing and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPassionate lecturesManageable writingClear assignmentsLaid backInconsistent grading feedback
  • Most online students describe Dunn as passionate, entertaining, and informative.
  • Work is writing-heavy but usually manageable, with .
  • One negative review raises a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

The workload is manageable and grades can be high, but guaranteed easy A.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Assignments are described as easy or manageable, and lectures help support the material despite frequent writing.

All course-easiness evidence comes from online HIST017 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Online , and the course appears organized around video lectures and assignments.

in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him for passionate lectures and manageable work, but .

Recommendation evidence is online-only and mostly positive with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Most students earned strong grades, but one .

Format shift

Online evidence is mixed, and there is .

Workload

Light

76/100

Students mention writing assignments, but they are described as short, manageable, and sometimes limited to maybe two papers.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students mostly describe him as passionate, lively, informative, and .

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from online reviews, so no format comparison is possible.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears centered on writing assignments and mentioned.

Format shift

Online reviews point strongly to assignment-based assessment, with no in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly positive, highlighting lively lectures and manageable writing, but .

Main concern

some students.

What students said

“a lot of writing assignments, but he honestly did not require them to be too long, so they were manageable.”
HIST017
“ .”
HIST017
“Very energetic and lively with , and .”
HIST017

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove traditional exams, and the known assessment evidence centers on papers and writing assignments.

Writing assignmentsPapersLittle to no quizzesNo clear exam evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention writing assignments, papers, and little to no quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Writing assignmentsPapersLittle to no quizzesNo clear proctoring evidenceNo clear traditional exam evidence
“a lot of writing assignments, but he honestly did not require them to be too long, so they were manageable.”
HIST017
“Very energetic and lively with , and .”
HIST017

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is extremely laid back and makes for a good semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online course structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“You can tell he is passionate about what he does and and information .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“This professor is extremely laid back and makes for a good semester.”

⚖️

58/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You can tell he is passionate about what he does and and information .
  • Lectures were pretty entertaining at times
  • the video lectures were very informative and useful for the class discussions.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • a lot of writing assignments, but he honestly did not require them to be too long, so they were manageable.
  • and if not send a message and he would clarify.
  • Very energetic and lively with , and .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • He praised my work but gave me a 22 out of 25 and did not say why .
  • He did this throughout the course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Four online-only reviews provide useful detail but limited sample size and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST0174 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values