AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Jeffrey Haig

BUMA010 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if and self-teach, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy online workloadSlow email repliesSelf-teaching requiredDetailed feedbackFair if on time
  • Online students report , and slow replies.
  • In-person evidence is much more positive and .
  • Grades can be strong, but online and manage deadlines independently.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A strong grade is realistic if work is completed on time, but and .

, while the only in-person review says expectations are manageable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is not described as conceptually extreme, but and .

Online reviews make the course feel harder because lecture support is limited; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The reviews do .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

, but online students complain about workload and communication delays.

In-person evidence is positive, while online evidence is mixed and more self-directed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Grades can be high, but comments suggest picky feedback and few graded .

Format shift

and less supported, while if work is on time.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Online students repeatedly mention lots of , and many moving parts.

Format shift

Heavy workload is mainly supported by online reviews, with little in-person workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students appreciate feedback and one in-person review is strong, but online students report self-teaching and .

Format shift

Online teaching support is weaker, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, suggesting a mixed assessment structure.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions both assignments and exams, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and says success comes from doing expected work on time.

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one review.

What students said

“Mr. Haig was awesome, you just have to do what is expected for class on time.”
BUMA010

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe heavy work, , and .

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves while .

What students said

“there was so much going on”
BUMA010
“You basically teach yourself and .”
BUMA010

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews only clearly support that of proctoring or open-book policy.

Hard ExamsStudy Required

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

and studying, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home rules.

Hard ExamsStudy Required
“The notes.”
BUMA010

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You basically teach yourself and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Support

58/100

“You basically teach yourself and .”

📚 Workload

28/100

“there was so much going on”

👍 Recommendation

65/100

“Mr. Haig was awesome, you just have to do what is expected for class on time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You basically teach yourself and .
  • He comments so much on your stuff, but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The notes.
  • Mr. Haig was awesome, you just have to do what is expected for class on time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

and one in-person, so the evidence is useful but limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUMA0103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1