AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Keegan Goodman

PHIL014 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want deep philosophy and can tolerate disorganization, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerThoughtful teacherCaringDisorganized structureReading-heavyDeep philosophy
  • In-person students describe him as caring, thoughtful, and intellectually engaging.
  • The online review is strongly negative because of poor communication and lack of structure.
  • Grades look attainable, but the experience depends heavily on patience with organization issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades are strong and one online student earned an A despite a poor experience, but organization problems can raise the practical effort cost.

Online evidence suggests a high grade may be possible despite confusion, while but and patience.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course is not rated as very hard, but students describe deep thinking, reading, and .

Online difficulty came more from lack of structure, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Participation matters appears in tags, but .

Both formats mention participation, but neither clearly proves an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and depth, but the online review strongly warns against taking the class.

Recommendation is positive in person and negative online, making the overall recommendation format-dependent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grades are favorable across all three reviews, but comments .

Format shift

Both online and B.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The workload appears manageable, but , and .

Format shift

Online workload was made harder by poor direction, while and thought.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is caring and thoughtful in person, but online communication and structure problems are serious.

Format shift

In-person teaching is rated positively, while online teaching is described as disorganized and poorly communicated.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention reading, participation, and few graded items, but do not clearly establish an .

Format shift

Online evidence notes work was posted late, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and intellectual depth, though one still notes disorganization.

Main concern

and requires patience.

What students said

“Professor Goodman is very thoughtful and truly cares.”
PHIL014
“He is a deep thinker and .”
PHIL014

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports severe disorganization, long communication gaps, and little direction.

Main concern

Poor structure and communication made the course confusing.

What students said

“ .”
PHIL014
“There was no structure or direction.”
PHIL014

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Keegan is a great professor. You can tell he really loves philosophy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting the and negative online structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Professor Goodman is very thoughtful and truly cares.”

⚠️ Online Structure

30/100

“Half of the time I had no idea what was going on.”

👍 In-Person Value

62/100

“I am glad I took this course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Goodman is very thoughtful and truly cares.
  • Keegan is a great professor.
  • He is a deep thinker and .

Theme 2

💻 About Online Experience

  • The .
  • We had zero communication for almost 2 weeks after the semester started.
  • There was no structure or direction.

Theme 3

📚 About Course Demands

  • But if you have patience it will all come together.
  • But prepared for some PROFOUND thinking.
  • Very approachable!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, and the online and in-person experiences conflict strongly.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL0143 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values