AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Dawn Page

N001A · N010 · N20 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid if and , because reviews suggest the class is stressful and poorly aligned with exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest MismatchUnapproachableTough GraderDefensive With QuestionsLimited Evidence
  • Two of three reviews are strongly negative about attitude, clarity, and test preparation.
  • Students report lectures and preparation materials do not align well with tests.
  • One older , but it is outweighed by more detailed negative comments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student earned an A+, but reviews describe , and tests that are poorly supported by lectures.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course feels difficult because lectures reportedly do not prepare students for tests and questions may not be welcomed.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe an , so flexibility cannot be confidently judged.

There is no online evidence, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most detailed reviews discourage the course because students describe rude behavior, favoritism, and weak test preparation.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Difficulty ratings are high and , though grade evidence is too limited for a harsher conclusion.

Format shift

, and there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Reviews focus more on tests, lectures, and professor behavior than on a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students report unapproachable behavior, defensive responses to questions, and lectures that do not support exams.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in-person because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The strongest assessment evidence centers on tests and poor alignment between lectures, preparation materials, and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment, with no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and difficult exams.

Main concern

Students say lectures and materials do not prepare them for tests.

What students said

“Lectures full of tangents that do not apply to topics we were covering, do not prepare you for tests.”
N010
“lectures and preparation materials have little to do with the tests.”
N20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students say lectures and preparation materials do not match tests, but reviews do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring conditions.

Tests Poorly Aligned With LecturesHard TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Book Or Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lecture content and preparation materials, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or other exam conditions.

Tests Poorly Aligned With LecturesHard TestsPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Lectures full of tangents that do not apply to topics we were covering, do not prepare you for tests.”
N010
“lectures and preparation materials have little to do with the tests.”
N20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and classroom climate. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

🧪

28/100

“lectures and preparation materials have little to do with the tests.”

⚖️ Classroom Climate

25/100

“Took offense or seemed annoyed at students asking questions for clarity on lecture topics.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Unapproachable, rude, and disrespectful.
  • This professor was always helpful.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • Lectures full of tangents that do not apply to topics we were covering, do not prepare you for tests.
  • lectures and preparation materials have little to do with the tests.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Climate

  • This teacher shows definite favoritism
  • Speaks to students in a patronizing manner like they are children instead of adults.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is brief, so the negative pattern is notable but not deeply proven.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

N001A1 review
N0101 review
N201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values