AI Rate Professor

English

David Norton

ENG003A · ENG003 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

, but the online evidence is too risky to ignore.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPolarizing experienceClear in personPoor online communicationFlexible due datesOnline workload issues
  • The and describes an easy, supportive English class.
  • The online review is highly negative and , and same-day homework.
  • The overall recommendation depends strongly on course format.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The , but the online review reports unclear assignments and .

, while online evidence suggests unpredictable effort and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The in-person course sounds easy and supportive, but the online section becomes harder because .

In person appears beginner-friendly, while online appears harder due to poor structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Attendance is not clearly discussed, but .

In person sounds flexible with , while and locked grades.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split between a glowing in-person review and a severe online warning.

In , while online is strongly discouraged.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The , but the online review mentions locked grades and unclear expectations.

Format shift

, while and confusing.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

One review calls the class easy, while the online review reports lots of homework and same-day deadlines.

Format shift

In person sounds light, while online sounds heavier and less predictable.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

His teaching is praised in person but described as , and unresponsive online.

Format shift

Format difference is severe, with positive in-person teaching and poor online delivery.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments , and due dates rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point more .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The in-person review describes him as , and .

Main concern

There , so evidence is limited.

What students said

“Very easy going and made me most hated subject fun.”
ENG003
“ take an english class.”
ENG003

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports poor communication, unclear expectations, and .

Main concern

Students may not get timely guidance or .

What students said

“ ”
ENG003A
“Stay away from this teacher”
ENG003A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ take an english class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the sharp format split in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Split

52/100

“Ive never experienced this bad of a teacher before.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ take an english class.”

📝 Workload Risk

50/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very easy going and made me most hated subject fun.

Theme 2

📚 About Assignments

  • he

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, and they directly conflict across online and in-person formats.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG0031 review
ENG003A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values