AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Dawn Williams

CH03 · CHEM3 · CH003 · CHEM03 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you can handle blunt criticism, keep up with labs and homework, and use the extra help she offers.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditAccessible Outside ClassTough GraderRude ToneLab Confusion
  • She often provides help and , but students report a sharp and intimidating communication style.
  • The course requires real effort because , and as demanding.
  • Grades can be reachable for prepared students, but the learning experience is inconsistent and emotionally stressful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible through effort, attendance, and , but students repeatedly describe tough grading, heavy work, and .

The online evidence is easier because of , while and grading friction.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The chemistry content is made harder by skipped steps, intense labs, and .

The single online review sounds manageable, while and pacing problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

because students say skipping class hurts success and participation matters.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

53/100

and structure, but many warn that her tone makes the class difficult to tolerate.

The online review is positive with caveats, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

helps, but repeated tough-grader comments keep grading from feeling truly lenient.

Format shift

Online grading sounds more forgiving, while as tough.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students mention lots of homework, intense labs, and .

Format shift

The heavy-workload .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is knowledgeable and sometimes helpful, but many students say rude tone, belittling responses, and .

Format shift

The online review is mildly positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and , with tests appearing especially important.

Format shift

, while the online review only mentions and support.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between students who value her help and , and overloaded.

Main concern

The main risk is her rude or intimidating tone during questions and lab work.

What students said

“It's when she skips steps & she assumes that you are up to her speed.”
CHEM03
“She likes to help everyone understand the material and .”
CH003

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review says she can be rude but , and enough to make the class manageable.

Main concern

Students may need thick skin because tone is still a concern online.

What students said

“This class is an easy A if you have thick skin.”
CHEM03

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a , but they do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Test HeavyExam Details Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly describe the class as test heavy, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Test HeavyExam Details Not Clearly Proven
“Test heavy”
CHEM03
“ , but offers .”
CHEM03

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book status, or quiz structure.

Exam Details Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She offers her time time to students that are struggling, but can be unkind with her tone and words.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and lab support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She likes to help everyone understand the material and .”

⚖️

50/100

“ , but offers .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“ , and with very little guidance.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She can be down right rude, short tempered, and degrading.
  • behavior.
  • She is quite smart, but her attitude really limits her quality of instruction.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !
  • She also offers tons of .
  • People complaining on here are people who dont want to really earn their grade.

Theme 3

🧪 About Labs

  • , and with very little guidance.
  • , but does offer .
  • Do your because she does a poor job explaining why or what needs to be done.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across several years give consistent evidence on , accessibility, rude tone, and lab difficulty.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CH0037 reviews
CHEM036 reviews
CH032 reviews
CHEM31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2