AI Rate Professor

Art

Cathy Allen

ART001 · ART1A · ART005B · 005A · INTROTOART · PRINT1 · ART003A · ART01 · ART000 · ART1 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle blunt critique, strict participation expectations, and a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict gradingAttendance mattersPolarizing feedbackParticipation heavyInconsistent experience
  • Students strongly disagree on her teaching, with some calling her inspiring and others describing harsh treatment.
  • Getting a high grade depends heavily on participation, following directions, and matching expectations.
  • Attendance and in-class effort appear important, while as strict or inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but comments , and satisfying subjective expectations.

The evidence is mainly from in-person reviews, while the single online .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Intro , but , and subjective standards make the class feel harder.

; the online review does not clearly describe content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple students say absences matter and skipping class can hurt or prevent passing.

Attendance evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Some students find her inspiring, but many warn against taking her because of harsh treatment and .

In-person reviews are split, while the only online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students often describe tough, subjective, or .

Format shift

, but the online evidence is only one review.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload includes projects, papers, participation, and class practice but is not consistently described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload evidence is almost entirely in-person; .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Her teaching is polarizing, with strong praise for feedback and knowledge offset by many reports of belittling or poor instruction.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed, while the only online review is very negative about treatment.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and class work rather than exams.

Format shift

; the online review does not clearly describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly polarized, praising her knowledge and feedback while and attendance.

Main concern

Students report harsh or and a strong need to participate.

What students said

“She will not just hand you a grade just for showing up, she expects work and participation.”
ART001
“She gave no feed back or help and gave straight A students (with .”
ART003A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and focuses on rude treatment and .

Main concern

Personal conflict and .

What students said

“She has no consistancy with grading and creates personal vendettas.”
ART001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the structure.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Reviews do .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She will not just hand you a grade just for showing up, she expects work and participation.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“I learned FAR more from Cathy than all the others combined.”

⚖️

25/100

“She has no consistancy with grading and creates personal vendettas.”

📌

15/100

“Dont BE ABSENT. she counts your absence and doesn't like it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and very knowledgeable.
  • Poor instruction, I don't believe Allen is actually very talented .
  • She is fair, but expects the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Seriously a C in an intro to art class?
  • As long as you did what she wanted in the class, listened to what she said and participated, A for you.
  • If you do all the work, you will get a good grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Experience

  • She unlocked in me a fountain of passion for art I never knew I had.
  • Horrible attitude and targets particular students
  • She takes her misery out on her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The review set is large and spans many years, but opinions are highly polarized and some comments are vague.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ART0018 reviews
ART015 reviews
005A2 reviews
ART0001 review
ART003A1 review
Show 5 more courses
ART005B1 review
ART11 review
ART1A1 review
INTROTOART1 review
PRINT11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

4

B 4

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values