AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Lonnie Mills

NSG · NSG401 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

if you can handle a difficult nursing class with mixed teaching support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingVery difficultProfessional mentorWeak teaching concerns
  • Two of three reviews are strongly negative about teaching quality.
  • One review describes her as helpful, professional, and a mentor.
  • The difficulty rating is very high, and there is little evidence of .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

The class appears hard to earn a high grade in because difficulty is high and comments .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online grade evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students report very high difficulty, and the material required help to understand.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state the .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most comments are negative, despite one student praising her mentorship and professionalism.

Recommendation and is sharply mixed but mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

High difficulty and limited grade evidence suggest strict outcomes, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and just .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The course appears demanding because students rate it very difficult, though workload details are sparse.

Format shift

All and are mostly difficulty-based.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

One student found her helpful, but two reviews describe serious disappointment or poor teaching presence.

Format shift

The teaching evidence is entirely in person and mixed with a negative majority.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and none describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, though one student found her helpful and professional.

Main concern

Teaching quality is inconsistent and several students describe poor classroom fit.

What students said

“Terrible disappointment. Good she left so others can learn.”
NSG
“ the material.”
NSG401
“Does not look or speak like a teacher”
NSG401

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible disappointment. Good she left so others can learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and student support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Does not look or speak like a teacher”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

32/100

“Terrible disappointment. Good she left so others can learn.”

🤝 Mentorship Exception

60/100

“ the material.She was my mentor, and always professional.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not look or speak like a teacher
  • the material.

Theme 2

📉 About Student Experience

  • Terrible disappointment. Good she left so others can learn.
  • She was my mentor, and always professional.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

The review count is small and old, but the comments show a .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NSG4012 reviews
NSG1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values