AI Rate Professor

English

C Valero

ENG03A · ENG51 · ENG3 · ENGLISH · ENG3A · ENG · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you are ready for , and limited support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard graderHeavy essaysNot helpfulStrict attendanceOff-topic lectures
  • Most reviews describe poor teaching, weak help, and .
  • The workload is heavy, with repeated mentions of weekly or overlapping essays.
  • , and one student says missed or late classes hurt the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

16/100

Getting an A looks very hard because students report , and grade penalties for missed or late classes.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online grade evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course content is not described as conceptually advanced, but the writing pace and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and and poor support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

because one student says missed and late classes turned A .

and suggests low flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn against taking her because of , and heavy essay workload.

Recommendation and is mostly negative despite two positive outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call her grading extremely hard or unfair, with one saying A issues.

Format shift

and is strongly negative.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Several students describe weekly essays and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload complaints are frequent.

Teaching experience

Awful

24/100

Most comments say she is not helpful, boring, off topic, or does not teach effectively.

Format shift

The number of positive exceptions.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews focus heavily on essays and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the assessment evidence centers on writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are , and attendance pressure.

Main concern

and little useful instruction.

What students said

“ .”
ENG
“A .”
ENG03A
“ .”
ENGLISH
“She's a little cooky but who isn't in the desert!”
ENG3A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and papers but do not clearly prove any specific exam policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She doesn't teach you anything”

⚖️

12/100

“She grades extremely hard.”

📚 Workload

10/100

“ .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is very boring and dry.
  • She doesn't teach you anything
  • drifts far off topic continously!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She grades extremely hard.
  • .
  • I got A's on all of my papers but because I missed some classes and were late, I got a C.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • .
  • A .
  • Most of the class we were expected to be working on 3 different essays at a time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years give consistent negative detail, though several old no-comment ratings add less evidence.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG513 reviews
ENGLISH3 reviews
ENG2 reviews
ENG3A2 reviews
ENG03A1 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG31 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values