AI Rate Professor

Reading

Lois Cheraz

ENG3A · RDG51 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if , and a highly demanding style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery strictHigh effort requiredCourse-dependent experienceHeavy testingMixed respectfulness
  • Reviews are sharply split, with strong praise in Reading and severe criticism in English 3A.
  • and substantial repeated testing, especially in RDG51.
  • She may help willing students, but several comments warn that the class requires a lot of effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but comments show it requires heavy effort and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material and class structure feel challenging because students mention frequent vocabulary and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on course and tolerance for strictness, with strong praise in Reading but strong warnings for English 3A.

All and differs by course.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report C, D, and and describe her as extremely strict.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss grading, mainly in ENG3A.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload appears heavy because students describe multiple vocabulary and reading tests every class meeting.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Some students call her great and supportive, while others describe her as rude, strict, and disrespectful.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and the teaching experience varies sharply by course.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize essays, vocabulary tests, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews vary strongly by course, with RDG51 students more positive and ENG3A students reporting harsh grading and disrespect.

Main concern

The , and .

What students said

“she is a great teacher will work with you as long as you are willing”
RDG51
“She is extremely strict and , and F's”
ENG3A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention frequent vocabulary and , but do not prove proctoring, book policy, or .

Vocabulary TestsReading TestsEssay Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention repeated vocabulary and reading tests, but .

Vocabulary TestsReading TestsEssay Grading
“Every class meeting, we have two chapters of vocabulary tests; .”
RDG51
“ , and F's”
ENG3A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she is a great teacher will work with you as long as you are willing”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Great Teacher.”

⚖️

25/100

“She is extremely strict and , and F's”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“Every class meeting, we have two chapters of vocabulary tests; .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is a great teacher will work with you as long as you are willing
  • Great Teacher.
  • She is RUDE, goes off on useless tangents

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you have to put alot of effort into knowing the material.
  • She is extremely strict and , and F's
  • Every class meeting, we have two chapters of vocabulary tests; .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

, but opinions conflict strongly across courses.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

RDG513 reviews
ENG3A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values