AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Carol Kendall

LVN3 · VN003 · NSGCARD · NURSING · BASIC110 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

if you are highly self-driven and comfortable with hard nursing material, unclear lectures, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear lecturesHarsh testsHeavy studying requiredMixed expertisePoor support
  • and limited help for students.
  • Tests are described as hard, including questions not covered in class.
  • A minority of reviews praise her subject knowledge and one exceptional class, so the experience is inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears very hard because students describe high difficulty, heavy studying, and .

All evidence comes from five in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The nursing content and tests are demanding, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

The , and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students advise against the class because of and poor support, despite one positive review.

Recommendation and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and questions not covered in class, making grading feel harsh.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students say they must study hard, read chapters, and know the material well.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Most , though a few students credit her expertise.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is mixed but entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Comments .

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, poor support, high difficulty, and hard tests, with one strong positive exception.

Main concern

Students report weak instruction and .

What students said

“She .”
VN003
“ and her tests.”
LVN3
“She is hard but fair.must study, read chapters, know your stuff.”
BASIC110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult tests and uncovered questions, but do not clearly prove proctoring, book policy, or .

Hard TestsUncovered Test QuestionsExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and questions not covered in class, but do not clearly describe exam rules.

Hard TestsUncovered Test Questions
“we get questions that we haven't covered in class.”
LVN3
“She is hard but fair.must study, read chapters, know your stuff.”
BASIC110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Try to get into the program elsewhere.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, testing, workload, and mixed outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She .”

⚖️

15/100

“we get questions that we haven't covered in class.”

📚 Difficulty

18/100

“She is hard but fair.must study, read chapters, know your stuff.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She .
  • and her tests.
  • Carol just doesn't seem interested in helping her students learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • we get questions that we haven't covered in class.
  • She is hard but fair.must study, read chapters, know your stuff.

Theme 3

⚖️ Mixed Student Experience

  • Exceptional class in arrythmias that has stayed with me for years
  • Try to get into the program elsewhere.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five older reviews give a consistent mostly negative pattern, but the time span is old and includes some conflicting praise.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BASIC1101 review
LVN31 review
NSGCARD1 review
NURSING1 review
VN0031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values