AI Rate Professor

Career Development

Teresa Aldredge

HSER364 · HSER362 · HCD122 · HCD310 · ENG50 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are comfortable working independently under strict expectations and limited support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnapproachableHarsh gradingHeavy homeworkPoor feedbackTense classroom
  • Most reviews describe her as cold, rude, unapproachable, or unhelpful.
  • Students often say assignments are not intellectually hard but grading and directions feel frustrating.
  • The strongest concern is poor support, especially for a course area tied to counseling and student success.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The coursework may not be conceptually hard, but , and heavy homework make earning an A unreliable.

Online reviews emphasize homework and delayed grading, while , and tense interactions.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Students often say the class content itself is not hard, but the professor's expectations and communication make the experience harder than the material.

Both formats suggest the content can be easy, but in-person reviews contain more complaints about classroom management and interpersonal issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and even being locked out after leaving class, so attendance flexibility appears low.

, while online reviews do not clearly establish a flexible attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because they describe poor , and an uncomfortable learning environment.

Both formats are negative, but and more consistent across many years.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly mention tough grading, , and grades posted very late.

Format shift

and , while in-person reviews stress strict formatting and point deductions.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is often described as too much, with , and homework.

Format shift

Online reviews call the homework excessive, while , and participation tasks.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Most comments describe her as cold, rude, unapproachable, unhelpful, discouraging, or absent from meaningful guidance.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weak feedback and grading, while and poor approachability.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears assignment-heavy, with papers, discussions, presentations, quizzes, participation, and formatting-sensitive written work.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on homework and written assignments, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

about being unapproachable, rude, strict, and discouraging.

Main concern

The main concern is a tense learning environment with poor communication and strict classroom behavior expectations.

What students said

“She is difficult to approach, callous, and unreasonable.”
HSER362
“Rude. Creates tense learning environment.”
HSER362
“I really dreaded this class everyday and .”
HCD122

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing , and little useful guidance.

Main concern

and little visibility into grades until late in the term.

What students said

“she .”
HCD310
“ ."”
HCD310
“Youre better off asking a student how you are doing in class than her.”
HCD310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyQuizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation but do not clearly prove a specific exam format or proctoring policy.

Quizzes Mentioned
“ .”
HSER362

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is difficult to approach, callous, and unreasonable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

16/100

“Terrible counselor with no guidance or care.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“Look for other professors instead of this one.”

⚖️

22/100

“ or she takes off many points.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Unapproachable.
  • Rude. Creates tense learning environment.
  • She is EXTREMELY unapproachable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The class itself is not hard at all but she is meh.
  • she .
  • she expects work turned in on time

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • She was cold, distant, and did not offer any help.
  • Youre better off asking a student how you are doing in class than her.
  • , and she is very unapproachable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews span many years and the negative themes are highly consistent, though some older reviews are brief.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

HSER3628 reviews
HCD3104 reviews
ENG502 reviews
HCD1222 reviews
143551 review
Show 1 more courses
HSER3641 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1