AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Marianina Godinho

ACCT121 · ACCT341 · ACCT14916 · ACCT311 · ACCT301 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
88%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a supportive accounting professor and can keep up with and deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaring supportExtra creditHomework heavyMostly fair grading
  • Students , and willingness to support students.
  • Grades are usually very attainable because of , dropped scores, multiple tries, and .
  • The , and occasional strictness with deadlines or video requirements.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very realistic if students complete the , and .

Online evidence includes both easy-A comments and newer strict workload complaints, while and dropped scores.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The accounting content and resources, but , and QuickBooks details can be tedious.

Online courses rely heavily on videos and structured homework, while , and attendance.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance and participation are important, and some reviews mention strict tardiness or video-watching expectations.

Online flexibility is limited by required video tracking and deadlines, while and participation as important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Most students recommend her because she teaches clearly, cares about students, and gives many chances to succeed.

, though the online format has more recent complaints about strictness and workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, and many A grades make grading forgiving when students do the work.

Format shift

In-person reviews most strongly mention drops and extra credit, while online , and some strict penalties.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is steady and , but most students describe it as manageable rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

Online reviews mention videos, WileyPlus, QuickBooks, and daily work, while , and outlines.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students repeatedly describe her as , and strong at explaining accounting.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, with online reviews emphasizing videos and email support and in-person reviews emphasizing lectures and personal help.

Assessment method

Balanced

57/100

Grades appear , and occasional projects rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, videos, WileyPlus, quizzes, tests, and no final in one course, while , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive about caring , and clear help, with some complaints about reading-heavy outlines.

Main concern

Attendance and because accounting builds week to week.

What students said

“Easy A if you put the work & study!”
ACCT301
“She is strict about being tardy but she is wonderful with delivering her lecture and making sure you understand the material.”
ACCT301
“Gives lots of , and does everything she can to give an A.”
ACCT301

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews , and support, but recent ACCT311 complaints describe daily work and strict video-view tracking.

Main concern

Online students must keep up with , and precise submission requirements.

What students said

“Just keep up with the work and you'll get an easy A.”
ACCT301
“Way too much work due every day and strict video watching requirements.”
ACCT311
“ and easy to understand.”
ACCT301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly because reviews mention dropped assessments, , cheat sheets, and , but exact policies vary by course.

Extra CreditDropped TestsDropped QuizzesTake-Home FinalNo Final In One Online Course

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention dropped tests, cheat sheets, hints before exams, and a , but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Dropped TestsDropped QuizzesCheat SheetsTake-Home FinalExam Hints
“ having 2 test combined, but gave enough time to do it.”
ACCT121
“She allows cheat sheets and will let you know whats going to be on the test/quizzes.”
ACCT301
“she drops 2 quizes and one test.”
ACCT14916

Online

Online reviews mention exams and no final in one ACCT301 section, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

No Final In One Online CourseFour ExamsExtra Credit
“No final, 4 exams through the semester.”
ACCT301
“A solid foundation into the world of accounting, this professor has a timely manner, and is accessible for questions.”
ACCT301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Godinho really cares about her students and wants them to pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Professor Godinho is an amazing teacher. Her lectures make it very easy to understand the accounting process.”

📈 Grade Value

86/100

“Easy A if you put the work & study!”

⚖️ Workload Balance

50/100

“ and it almost always opens on Monday.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and easy to understand.
  • She is wonderful with delivering her lecture and making sure you understand the material.
  • She if you don't understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Gives lots of , and does everything she can to give an A.
  • She offers three tries on hw and gives the answers after all 3
  • if your grades are high.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Way too much work due every day and strict video watching requirements.
  • Very .
  • The workload was pretty manageable for the whole semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty detailed reviews across many years and both formats show a consistent positive pattern with a few recent strictness concerns.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCT30122 reviews
ACCT3113 reviews
ACCT1212 reviews
ACCT3412 reviews
ACCT149161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2