AI Rate Professor

Health Education

Kristine Wise

NUTR300 · NUTRITION · NUTRI300 · NUTRI1565 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a supportive nutrition professor and can keep up with steady weekly work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and niceClear feedbackHeavy writing workloadWeekly discussionsMixed test fairness
  • Students often describe Wise as , and helpful.
  • Getting an A is realistic, but , and .
  • Online reviews are more mixed because some students report and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is common and sometimes described as easy, but it , and time management.

Online evidence is more mixed, while and clear expectations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Nutrition content is generally manageable and clearly taught, but tests and .

Online students mention posted lectures and videos, while , and textbook-based tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy, though .

Online work is asynchronous in the comments, while in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most students recommend her for kindness and clarity, but workload and .

, while online reviews include both strong praise and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Grades appear generally attainable with A outcomes and , but some and point deductions.

Format shift

In-person comments mention and clear criteria, while .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is steady with weekly discussions, quizzes, writing, projects, and a major dietary analysis assignment.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly discussions and long dietary analysis, while and papers.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students , and helpful, though a few find lectures boring or tests poorly designed.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is split between strong support and frustration.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades seem based on a mix of , and tests.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and tests, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and care, though several mention lots of homework and boring slide lectures.

Main concern

Some students find the class writing-heavy or lecture-heavy despite fair learning value.

What students said

“Very thorough, motivational and !”
NUTRI300
“Plenty of opportunities!”
NUTRI300
“Multiple homeworks due at once and there's lots of them!”
NUTR300

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students report an achievable A with posted lectures, but workload and .

Main concern

Weekly discussions, long dietary analysis work, and .

What students said

“It's super easy to get an A, and the professor is extremely nice.”
NUTR300
“The downside is the dietary analysis are LONG, and so if you procrastinate, that's your fault.”
NUTR300
“ ask which of the following statements are true”
NUTR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and essay exams plus online multiple-choice versions, and some online students report hard tests.

Weekly QuizzesShort Answer ExamsEssay Response ExamsMultiple-Choice Online VersionHard Online Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention short-answer and essay in-class exams plus a multiple-choice online version, but .

Short Answer ExamsEssay Response ExamsMultiple-Choice Online Version
“ with a multiple-choice online version as well.”
NUTRI300

Online

and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesHard Online Tests
“ ask which of the following statements are true”
NUTR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's an amazing teacher who truly wants to help her students succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She's an amazing teacher who truly wants to help her students succeed.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“Just expect a lot of work.”

⚖️

72/100

“Plenty of opportunities!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very thorough, motivational and !
  • Awesome teacher. Super easy if you pay attention and .
  • She made it fun and exciting and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's super easy to get an A, and the professor is extremely nice.
  • Plenty of opportunities!
  • Even if you answer the question fully .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • The downside is the dietary analysis are LONG, and so if you procrastinate, that's your fault.
  • Multiple homeworks due at once and there's lots of them!
  • Every week, there is a discussion and quiz.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews span many years with consistent themes, but some evidence is old and online opinions are split.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 56
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUTR3006 reviews
NUTRI3005 reviews
NUTRI15651 review
NUTRITION1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values