AI Rate Professor

English

Kelsey Ford

ENGWR301 · ENG301 · ENGLT310 · ENGWR300 · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
63.49%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Ford if and will revise your work, but if group projects or strict writing rubrics are a dealbreaker.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportiveStrong writing feedbackRevision-focusedTime-consuming papersPolarized group-project complaints
  • Most recent , and ability to help students improve as writers.
  • The work is usually described as manageable but because revision is central.
  • A cluster of older negative , and withdrawals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is very realistic if you complete drafts, revise, and , but the course is not effortless.

Online has both easy-A praise and harsh group-project complaints, while leads to strong grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The writing and , though older literature and ENGWR301 group projects can feel demanding.

and , while online reviews depend more on self-paced writing and revision.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Participation matters in several reviews, but there is courses.

, while online reviews focus on deadlines and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and feedback, but the repeated older withdrawal complaints prevent a .

In-person sentiment is steadier and more positive, while online sentiment is more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

She offers revision chances and clear criteria, but some students report and .

Format shift

Online ENGWR301 has the strongest harsh-grading complaints, while A grades.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and some group projects, so it takes time even when students say it is not hard.

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers and group projects heavily, while , and revision.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Recent reviews consistently describe her as caring, available, and .

Format shift

, but online reviews include more severe negative outliers about support and group work.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews , and research work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with online ENGWR301 complaints focused strongly on group projects and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person , and an approachable classroom.

Main concern

A smaller , and difficult group work.

What students said

“She makes the class a safe space to learn and grow as a writer and a college student.”
ENGWR300
“ .”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between many strong recent praise reports and a .

Main concern

Some online ENGWR301 students describe group projects and grading as harsh.

What students said

“There is a lot of work, but it's not hard. It just takes time.”
ENGWR300
“You get one team for the entire semester to .”
ENGWR301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly discuss essays, revisions, readings, and group projects, so .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatAssignment-heavy courses

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, midterm, or final exam policies.

Reviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Path

68/100

“It's really up to you to earn the grade that you want.”

⚠️ Main Risk

55/100

“The , so if they don't do their work and you did, you're going to get at most a 50% on that project.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so helpful.
  • She really walks you through the writing process and .
  • if you need extra help.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • The work isn't hard, but .
  • There are lots of opportunities to revise and earn the higher grades.
  • Group projects and report.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She truly cares about you as a person and wants to see you be successful in this class and in life.
  • She answered emails quickly and reached out just to check in.
  • She even met with me on Zoom outside of her usual times.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span recent and older semesters with detailed, format-specific comments, though a repeated negative cluster may overrepresent one dispute.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 520

Course coverage

ENGWR30021 reviews
ENGWR30113 reviews
ENG30110 reviews
ENGLT3106 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

19

A 16 · A- 3

B range

9

B 9

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

20

Drop/Withdrawal 18 · Not sure yet 2