AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Matthew Rodrigues

MATH335 · MATH144 · MATH125 · MATH400 · STAT300 · MATH120 · MATH370 · MATH343 · MATH401 · MATH402 · MATH100 · STATS300 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
35.42%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid him unless and are comfortable with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyTough examsMixed explanationsStrict attendanceHigh grade risk
  • Reviews are sharply divided, but many students report .
  • Some students praise his caring attitude, partial credit, and willingness to explain, especially when they are already prepared.
  • A large negative cluster describes unclear teaching, , and poor outcomes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible for strong self-studiers, but and can sink students despite homework effort.

Online evidence is too limited to judge, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is challenging and often becomes harder because students say , and .

The single online review is more positive, but in-person reviews overwhelmingly drive the challenging-course judgment.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several reviews say attendance is crucial or strict, including penalties for missing or leaving labs early.

Attendance concerns come almost entirely from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most negative reviews warn that , and harsh grade weighting make him a risky choice.

The lone online review recommends him, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Grades are often controlled by tough exams, few high-stakes assessments, little or , and limited .

Format shift

, while online grading evidence is insufficient.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report lots of , and major self-study outside class.

Format shift

The online review mentions lots of homework, and and exam preparation.

Teaching experience

Poor

43/100

Some students find him caring and clear, but many more describe , missing steps, disorganization, or .

Format shift

Online evidence is positive but only one review, while pattern.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are repeatedly described as dominated by unit exams, finals, quizzes, and .

Format shift

, while online assessment evidence is not clear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with many students , and strict attendance.

Main concern

Grades depend heavily on difficult exams that many students .

What students said

“the and .”
MATH401
“If you want a good letter grade, I say try a different professor.”
MATH402

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review but still notes lots of homework and an early-class issue.

Main concern

There is only one online review, so online evidence is weak and not representative.

What students said

“ ”
MATH343

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The rather than clearly proven proctoring or open-book rules.

Test HeavyDifficult ExamsFew High-Stakes TestsNo Study GuidesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly describe tough, heavily weighted exams, weekly quizzes, no notes or study guides, and .

Difficult ExamsFinal HeavyWeekly QuizzesNo Study GuidesFew High-Stakes Tests
“There are no notes for tests and no study guides.”
MATH401
“Grade = 35% Final, 55% exams, 10% Quiz, 5% HW”
MATH401
“ .”
MATH402

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want a good letter grade, I say try a different professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: High.

🧪

20/100

“the and .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

43/100

“ aren't very skilled at math.”

⚖️

22/100

“You can get 90% on Labs, but if you fail the .”

Theme 1

🧪 About Exams

  • .
  • He try his best to find the hardest questions for exams and give you lettle time to finish.
  • if you don't memorize formulas.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • you understand it.
  • Skips a lot of steps which makes it very hard to understand.
  • and boring

Theme 3

📉 About Grades and Workload

  • Grade = 35% Final, 55% exams, 10% Quiz, 5% HW
  • and optional.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 reviews span many years and courses, with unusually detailed and , and preparation gaps.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 512
3 out of 55
2 out of 56
1 out of 524

Course coverage

MATH33513 reviews
STAT3008 reviews
MATH1205 reviews
MATH4015 reviews
MATH3704 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH4003 reviews
MATH4023 reviews
STATS3003 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
MATH1442 reviews
MATH1001 review
MATH3431 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 5

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

13

F 13

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 3