AI Rate Professor

English

Beverly Harrington

ENGLISHW300 · ENGWR101 · ENG300 · ENWR300 · ENG101 · ENGWR300 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
46.34%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Beverly Harrington only if you , and inconsistent support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear InstructionsHeavy Writing LoadTough GradingMixed FeedbackResponsive When Helpful
  • Reviews are sharply split, with many students praising support while and .
  • The class is writing-heavy, with , and tutoring or participation expectations appearing often.
  • Getting a good grade is possible, but students report needing strong time management and tolerance for vague assignment guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly tie , and revisions while navigating strict or .

Online reviews include a few easy-A claims, but both formats show heavy writing and and quiz routines.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is not described as conceptually advanced, but the writing expectations, reading, and .

Online difficulty often comes from vague modules and assignments, while , and class participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

In-person reviews explicitly , and being dropped after absences, while online flexibility is limited by frequent due dates.

Online reviews do not show physical attendance rules, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because many recent students warn against taking her despite older and some positive reviews praising her care and feedback.

Online recent reviews are especially negative, while and more mixed between strong praise and serious complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students often call her a and , though some say revisions and effort can still lead to good grades.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews focus on essays, quizzes, and tough grading.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is consistently described as , and occasional tutoring or participation tasks.

Format shift

and essays, while in-person students repeatedly mention pop quizzes, books, worksheets, and five major papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

44/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some students finding her caring and helpful but many reporting vague instructions, disorganization, and .

Format shift

Online reviews lean more negative in recent years, while and repeated complaints about clarity and tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear dominated by essays, writing assignments, quizzes, reading checks, revisions, and a .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, while and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews also vary widely, but they more consistently , and a class that can improve writing for students who keep up.

Main concern

In-person students mainly worry , and the large essay-based grade structure.

What students said

“Must attend class or she will drop you after 2 absence.”
ENG300
“Prof Harrington really makes you work hard to get an A.”
ENG300
“She never rushed through her lectures and if you needed help, you got it.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are polarized, with some students calling her caring and responsive while many warn , and .

Main concern

Online students most often complain that and shifting expectations make the workload harder than it should be.

What students said

“ .”
ENGWR300
“Has assignments due random days throughout the week, so if you have a busy schedule.”
ENG300
“There is no way you can fail her class, do the quizzes and !”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited and inconsistent, with reviews mostly describing quizzes, essays, presentations, and a .

Open Book QuizzesFinal EssayDaily Pop QuizzesPresentationReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly mention open-book reading quizzes, daily pop quizzes, presentations, and , but .

Open Book QuizzesDaily Pop QuizzesFinal Research PaperPresentation
“Basically this class consists of essays(rough draft & final) & a presentation at the end (super easy).”
ENG300
“ .”
ENG300

Online

Online reviews mention quick quizzes and a final essay, but they do not clearly prove .

Quick QuizzesFinal EssayReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
“There is definitely a load of , and a few essays.”
ENGWR300
“The final is a 4 page essay”
ENG300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

44/100

“This and .”

⚖️

28/100

“ and she'll say your wrong.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“There is definitely a load of , and a few essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She provided and .
  • She doesn't proofread her own work and just leaves her errors which makes .
  • She never rushed through her lectures and if you needed help, you got it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Prof Harrington really makes you work hard to get an A.
  • There is no way you can fail her class, do the quizzes and !
  • Her quizzes in class are open book, but .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • There is definitely a load of , and a few essays.
  • Get prepared for typing the most challenging essays on word document files, and other stated writing prompts further instructed on whiteboard.
  • Has assignments due random days throughout the week, so if you have a busy schedule.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

55

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, include both formats, and provide detailed , and clarity.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 518

Course coverage

ENGWR30021 reviews
ENG30012 reviews
ENGLISHW30011 reviews
3002 reviews
ENWR3002 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENG1011 review
ENGWR1011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

11

A 9 · A- 2

B range

13

B+ 9 · B 4

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D+ 1

F

6

F 6

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 6