AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

David Castillo

BIT104 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable learning from heavy reading with little instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReading heavySlow lecturesUnresponsive emailsStrict late workConfusing materials
  • The only review is negative and reports poor responsiveness, inaccessible textbook materials, and slow lectures.
  • The workload is not described as , but reading and .
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one online review and no in-person data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A good grade does not look easy because the only student earned a C- and , and lots of reading.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content may not be advanced, but and basic class.

Only online evidence exists, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

Only online evidence exists, and it .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The student strongly discourages the class because of poor , and slow lectures.

The recommendation judgment is based only on one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

The review says , and the reported C- suggests little grade cushion.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists; .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The student says there is , but the .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists and centers on reading, quizzes, and long lectures.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

The instructor is described as okay but , and frustrating.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

The and long lectures, with .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes heavy reading, confusing textbook access, slow lectures, no late work, and .

Main concern

Students may feel unsupported when materials are confusing or questions go unanswered.

What students said

“he never responded to my emails and ”
BIT104
“Lots of… Lots… of reading.”
BIT104
“ .”
BIT104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because the review only mentions quizzes and does not prove proctoring, open-book status, webcam use, or .

Quizzes MentionedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review mentions quizzes but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Quizzes MentionedPolicy Not Proven
“ and long lectures….”
BIT104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the , and recommendation; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He's okay, i mean he never responded to my emails and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

45/100

“Lots of… Lots… of reading.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Reading And Materials

  • Lots of… Lots… of reading.
  • And the .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Support And Lectures

  • he never responded to my emails and
  • he speaks really slow

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is narrow even though the comment is specific.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BIT1041 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values