AI Rate Professor

English

Trang Abeid

ESLW340 · ENGRD120 · ENG58 · FOUNDATION42 · ESL340 · ENGWR301 · ENG300 · ENGRD310 · ENGRD110 · ENGWR300 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
31.25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want intensive writing practice and , and unclear expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Writing LoadUnclear InstructionsExtra CreditCaring But Demanding
  • Students repeatedly , and heavy papers or worksheets.
  • Positive , and rewards students who ask for help.
  • Online and in-person reviews both show high effort, but online comments and grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Getting an A usually requires sustained effort, careful writing, and tolerance for strict grading despite some and redo chances.

, while online reviews emphasize harsh rubric outcomes and and worksheet loads.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content is not always conceptually hard, but reading, writing volume, quizzes, and .

Online evidence points to confusing assignment design, while , and class participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance and participation appear important, but reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation more often, while online and grading.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

31/100

Most students do not recommend her because strict grading, heavy workload, and and .

Online recommendations are sharply divided but mostly grade-focused, while and workload complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many students say she deducts heavily, rarely gives full credit, and sometimes makes students redo work after low scores.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly call her the toughest grader, and , and late grading.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews frequently mention many papers, worksheets, readings, quizzes, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews give the strongest workload complaints, while , and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

33/100

Some students find her caring and helpful, but many describe confusing instructions, disorganization, disrespect, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize confusing written directions, while to very negative classroom experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Grades appear driven mainly by , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats center on written assignments, with and group projects more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with many complaints , and disorganization.

Main concern

In-person students most often complain that the workload and .

What students said

“She overwhelms students with papers and other assignments.”
ENGWR300
“A great teacher overall, but you must put effort into your grade.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews , and that does not fully offset the grade pressure.

Main concern

Online students are most concerned about harsh grading and .

What students said

“Her instructions for and conflicting, with contradicting information.”
ENGWR301
“It is literally impossible to get 100% in her class.”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, though and pop quizzes.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyReading QuizzesPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove a .

Reading QuizzesPop Quizzes
“ and most of .”
ENGWR300
“Get ready to read”
ENGWR300

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a good professor, but she is the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

33/100

“Helpful teacher but .”

⚖️

18/100

“It is literally impossible to get 100% in her class.”

📚 Workload

24/100

“She overwhelms students with papers and other assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is always ready to help, just make an effort and ask.
  • .
  • She gives really good feedback on how to improve in her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She is a and expects that .
  • You could have a 65% on an assignment but if it doesn't get 70%, it's a zero.
  • If you want a .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • She gives so many papers and quizzes
  • This class if by far had the .
  • Lots of writing assignments, but nothing difficult.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 33 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and and workload.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 517

Course coverage

ENGRD3107 reviews
ENGWR3007 reviews
ENG3004 reviews
ENGWR3014 reviews
ENG583 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENGRD1103 reviews
ESLW3402 reviews
ENGRD1201 review
ESL3401 review
FOUNDATION421 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

9

C+ 2 · C 7

D range

3

D 3

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2