AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Tamatha Gager

PSYC356 · PSYC335 · PSYCH300 · PSYC371 · PSYC300 · PSYC320 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
31.25%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can work independently, document your writing process, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAI Detector DisputesTough GraderExtra CreditDisorganized LecturesMixed Personality
  • Many students report serious grading issues , and .
  • Positive reviews describe an easy or manageable course with when students follow directions and .
  • Online reviews are more negative about AI detection and proctoring, while and lecture quality.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

53/100

An A is possible because quizzes and can be manageable, but strict rubrics, AI detector penalties, and late-work rules create real risk.

Online reviews show higher grading risk from AI detector disputes, while if students participate and follow directions.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The psychology content is often described as easy or straightforward, but learning can suffer from weak lectures and .

Online students often self-teach from videos or textbooks, while disorganized lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Participation and class presence matter in several sections, but reviews do not prove a .

In-person comments mention participation and not missing class more often, while online comments focus on deadlines and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Recommendation is low because repeated complaints , and rude communication outweigh the easy-course positives.

Online reviews are more strongly negative, while her humor and manageable structure.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly describe picky , and low tolerance for late or disputed work.

Format shift

, while in-person complaints include strict originality expectations and delayed grading.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is usually manageable with weekly quizzes, papers, discussions, and , but some students find the writing and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions, chapter reviews, quizzes, and exams, while , and weekly quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Some students find her caring and funny, but many describe rude , and reliance on videos or textbooks.

Format shift

Online students more often report self-teaching, while and disorganized lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears , and occasional group work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, chapter reviews, and exams, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between students who find her funny and manageable and .

Main concern

In-person students , and strict assignment expectations.

What students said

“It's honestly an easy A because it's mostly weekly quizzes with and 8-page. paper as the final.”
PSYC300
“In and we could barely get through 3 slides in one day.”
PSYC371

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews often describe AI detector disputes, strict grading, limited engagement, and .

Main concern

Online students are most concerned about AI detector penalties and .

What students said

“She heavily relies on AI detection tools which she claims work "98%" of the time.”
PSYC300
“The .”
PSYC300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some students mention multiple attempts and notes, while one online review reports Honorlock screen and face recording.

Honorlock Mentioned OnlineTwo Attempts MentionedOne Page of Notes MentionedNo Tests Mentioned In One Section

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests with notes and in another, so reviews do not prove a single policy.

No Tests In One SectionOne Page of NotesMidterms and FinalExtra Credit Questions
“Easy to pass overall. No tests.”
PSYC335
“2 midterms 1 final. Allows 2 attempts per test + 10-15 questions.”
PSYCH300

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Honorlock in one section and , so the policy appears inconsistent by course.

HonorlockScreen and Face RecordingMultiple AttemptsTimed Quizzes
“She required all students to use Honorlock, which records both your screen and face.”
PSYC300
“3 exams, about 90-100 questions. U get 2-3 tries, love that!”
PSYC371

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The difficulty isn't the class but from the prof.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“I learned from the textbook, not from her lectures”

⚖️

25/100

“Would flag your work as AI just because it wasn't "creative" even though the prompt says to summarize.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“ if you want to save your sanity.”

Theme 1

🤖 About AI and Grading

  • She relies heavily on AI detectors and she firmly believes that they are accurate.
  • 6 of as AI and I received 0s on them
  • She does not tolerate any AI usage for papers so don't be that person.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The learning material was mainly through different YouTube videos, ted talks, and some recorded lectures that go over the slides.
  • Her class is always interesting and fun.
  • In and we could barely get through 3 slides in one day.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • It's honestly an easy A because it's mostly weekly quizzes with and 8-page. paper as the final.
  • There are several opportunities for .
  • Doesn't allow ANY late work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 32 reviews include recent online and in-person detail with repeated , and class organization.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 516

Course coverage

PSYC30016 reviews
PSYC3207 reviews
PSYC3713 reviews
PSYCH3003 reviews
PSYC3562 reviews
Show 1 more courses
PSYC3351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 4 · A 7 · A- 5

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1