AI Rate Professor

English

Frank Graham

ENGWR300 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you can tolerate disorganization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery disorganizedEasy graderPoor communicationHelpful but confusing
  • Students consistently describe the class as easy but .
  • Online students report worse communication and .
  • , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A can be relatively easy because assignments and , but .

, while the online review focuses on disorganization rather than grade ease.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content appears easy, but confusion comes from poor organization rather than hard material.

, while the online review says assignment videos and course setup were confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

, but in-person students may need class contact because .

Only in-person comments mention talking after class, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

because disorganization and communication problems outweigh the easy workload.

The online review is explicitly negative, while review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, but another says late grading of practice work caused problems.

Format shift

Lenient grading is supported mainly by in-person evidence, while .

Workload

Light

76/100

Assignments are described as very easy, with the main burden coming from confusion rather than workload.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clearly describe workload amount.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students describe him as nice and helpful at times, but repeated disorganization and poor communication damage the teaching experience.

Format shift

Online teaching appears worse due to course setup issues, while but .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews mainly mention assignments, discussion posts, and .

Format shift

Both formats point to assignment-based assessment, with online comments specifically mentioning discussion posts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

and easy, but and confusing.

Main concern

Students may need to clarify expectations after class because organization is weak.

What students said

“ .”
ENGWR300
“he was extremely disorganized which caused a lot of issues & confusion.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is strongly negative, citing disorganization, missing grade transfers, and .

Main concern

Online course management and communication appear unreliable.

What students said

“ .”
ENGWR300
“ .”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . his assignments are very easy. he is a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ , however, he was extremely disorganized which caused a lot of issues & confusion.”

📉 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ .”

⚖️

70/100

“ . he is a .”

Theme 1

🧩 About Organization

  • .
  • .
  • he was extremely disorganized which caused a lot of issues & confusion.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • .
  • he is a .
  • At the end of the semester, he graded all the work he said he wasn't going to grade that was for "practice not credit".

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • .
  • he wont check ur emails so talk to him after class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are consistent about disorganization but limited in assessment detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR3003 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values