AI Rate Professor

Economics

Haengku Yoon

ECON310 · ECON304 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
39.13%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you can teach yourself from modules and tolerate group work for a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandFast lecturesSelf-teaching neededGroup projectsForgiving curve
  • Many students , and hard to understand, so self-teaching is often necessary.
  • Grading , and , but learning the material still feels difficult.
  • Group projects and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

The curve, , drops, and , but earning an A still requires heavy self-study and handling confusing instruction.

evidence, while online reviews are more negative about effort and clarity.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course content feels harder because , and students often must teach themselves.

Both formats report unclear instruction, with online reviews adding difficult-to-use lecture videos.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance expectations conflict across reviews, with one saying mandatory and another saying not mandatory, while participation can matter for .

The and inconsistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

because communication, pace, and organization make already difficult courses harder.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while him because of lenient grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

and complaints, students repeatedly mention curves, dropped exams, , repeated attempts, and low passing thresholds.

Format shift

In-person reviews contain most leniency evidence, while online reviews question whether the .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, but group projects, self-teaching, quizzes, and exam preparation make the workload feel demanding.

Format shift

and group projects, while online reviews describe twice the effort from confusion.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students frequently describe fast, unclear lectures, weak answers to questions, and a need to learn independently.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews criticize clarity, with online evidence specifically citing poor video quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and group projects, with exams still important.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe group projects and exams, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly cite fast , and self-teaching, though some praise the curve and .

Main concern

Students often need outside help or Canvas notes because lectures may not be enough.

What students said

“Be prepared to teach yourself the material.”
ECON304
“You would have to not try at all to fail this class.”
ECON310

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative and focus on hard grading, unclear materials, difficult lecture videos, and accommodation concerns.

Main concern

Online students may struggle with , and lack of support.

What students said

“His lecture videos are difficult to hear, see and understand.”
12999
“Professor did not adjust time for .”
12999

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams, quizzes, and a , but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Midterms and finalLowest exam droppedQuizzes with multiple attemptsNo clear proctoring evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews show multiple exams, a non-cumulative final in one course, and dropped or , but .

Dropped examNon-cumulative finalMidterm and final
“The after the .”
ECON304
“he drops 1 out of 4 exams.”
ECON304

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and exams but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

QuizzesExams
“Professor did not adjust time for .”
12999
“Avg Exam score 62%.”
12999

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to teach yourself the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Professor did a bad job teaching the curriculum.”

⚖️

70/100

“60-74.99% is a , and he drops 1 out of 4 exams.”

📚 Self-Teaching Load

32/100

“Be prepared to teach yourself the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He .
  • This professor lectures are very fast and to the point.
  • Lectures material but doesn't teach it.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • Grading gets curved like C with 59-74% or B with 75-89%, so less likely to fail.
  • 3 tries for every quiz, gives lots of EC for participation, and .
  • A lot of and brought my grade down.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • It was hard to understand him due to his accent
  • When you ask questions in .
  • His lecture videos are difficult to hear, see and understand.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The 23 reviews are recent, detailed, and strongly consistent about unclear lectures, self-teaching, group work, and .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 58

Course coverage

1299910 reviews
ECON3049 reviews
ECON3104 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 5

C range

9

C+ 1 · C 8

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1