AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

James Wilson

ESLG51 · ESLLANDR50 · ESL325 · ESLRD50 · ELSR50 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

He is generally a good fit for students who value a kind, creative teacher, but .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKind and respectfulHelpful teacherCreative lecturesLight homeworkOrganization varies
  • Most older reviews describe him as caring, respectful, helpful, and memorable.
  • Recent in-person reviews are more critical, citing poor organization, limited engagement, and one strong warning to stay away.
  • The class , but structure and speaking practice may vary.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Grades are mostly A-range and several reviews describe low difficulty, though one recent student found the class poorly organized and harder.

Online evidence is positive but sparse, while recent concern.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course seems accessible and supportive for many ESL students, but organization issues can .

Online reviews suggest an easy positive experience, while and recent structure complaints.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a , though participation appears relevant in some in-person classes.

, so the judgment is based on limited participation mentions.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and helpful, but recent negative reviews lower confidence.

Online reviews are fully positive but old, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Reported grades are mostly A-range, and .

Format shift

Both formats show positive grade outcomes, but the sample is small and uneven over time.

Workload

Light

80/100

One recent review , and older reviews do not describe a heavy workload.

Format shift

The clearest workload evidence is in-person, while online workload details are minimal.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most reviews praise his kindness, clarity, respect, and help, but recent comments question organization and engagement.

Format shift

Online reviews are highly positive but old, while and recent criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify a dominant assessment pattern, so .

Format shift

Neither online nor in-person reviews provide enough assessment detail for a strong format distinction.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and teaching, but the two most recent ones raise concerns about organization and attitude.

Main concern

Recent students may find the class unfocused or not interactive enough.

What students said

“Professor is kind, but the .”
ELSR50
“ and respectful to all students.”
ESLRD50

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are very positive but limited and older, praising him as an excellent instructor.

Main concern

The online evidence is too sparse and old to judge current structure or .

What students said

“He is the .”
ESLG51
“An artist in...”
ELSR50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the Browser, midterm format, or final format.

Pop quiz mentionNo clear exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews include a pop quiz tag but no .

Pop quiz mention
“Professor is kind, but the .”
ELSR50

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam, quiz, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a great teacher. and respectful to all students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting teaching support, organization concerns, and review recency. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“He is a great teacher. and respectful to all students.”

❤️ Student Support

76/100

“He loves to teach and help his students.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

55/100

“Professor is kind, but the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He has unusual teaching method, so you could learn a lot of new and interesting things from his lectures.
  • and respectful to all students.
  • He likes to have fun, but he is serious about student learning.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He loves to teach and help his students.
  • !
  • He is the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recent Concerns

  • Professor is kind, but the .
  • If you want a structured and engaging course, this may not be the .
  • I would stay away from this professor because the other reviews are fake.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 9 reviews are available, many are old or vague, and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ELSR504 reviews
ESL3252 reviews
ESLG511 review
ESLLANDR501 review
ESLRD501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values