AI Rate Professor

English

Taras Marchak

ENGWR101 · ENGWR58 · ENGWR302 · ENG58 · ENGWR41 · ENGL302 · ENGWR300103 · ENGWR301 · ENG101 · ENGLISHWRITING · ENGWRT302 · ENGWR300 · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
46.67%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Taras Marchak only if you , and limited feedback without much instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of homeworkEasy but tediousSlow gradingLimited feedbackStrict due dates
  • Students often say the class is not intellectually hard, but the workload is heavy and repetitive.
  • Grades can be achievable for organized or strong writers, but feedback and .
  • Online and some students praising clarity and others calling him absent or disengaged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is realistic for , and homework, but it is not low-effort because the workload is constant.

Online reviews lean toward easy grades with lots of tasks, while because attendance, handwriting, and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The concepts are usually manageable, but , and essays make the class feel demanding.

Both formats describe easy material mixed with tedious workload, though and handwritten work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

, and strict due dates or no late work reduce flexibility overall.

Online reviews focus more on strict deadlines, while and participation expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Recommendation is split because some students value the clear structure and easy grades, while , and .

Online reviews are sharply mixed, and and clear to absent, rude, or too workload-heavy.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

57/100

Grades are often achievable, but strict , and occasional tough grading keep it from feeling lenient.

Format shift

Online students mention easy grading but strict submission rules, while and tough essay grading.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and tedious filler assignments.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, with and in-person reviews emphasizing handwritten work and frequent essays.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching feedback is mixed, with some students praising clarity while many , and .

Format shift

Online reviews more often call him withdrawn or absent, while and complaints about feedback or attitude.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Assessment , and some finals or exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes, writing assignments, essays, midterms, and finals, while in-person reviews , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe a writing-heavy class with , and mixed teaching support.

Main concern

, and inconsistent feedback are the main issues.

What students said

“There was so much work for this class.”
ENGWR300103
“The work is doable but still a lot so if you find it hard to juggle a lot .”
ENGWR302
“Overall easy A hands down. Just attend class and do the homework.”
ENGWR41

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe easy but , and uneven instructor presence.

Main concern

Online students repeatedly complain about , and .

What students said

“ and essays.”
ENG101
“He graded all the ”
ENGWR301
“Easy A as long as you do the work.”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies across courses and , and finals without clear proof of strict proctoring or open-book policy.

Final EssayMultiple Choice MidtermGrammar TestsWeekly QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grammar finals, and essay-heavy assessment, but do not clearly prove open-book or strict proctoring policy.

Grammar TestsWeekly ExamsTextbook FinalGrammar Final
“There is a total of 3 essays and and grammar.”
ENGWR302
“ .”
ENGWR302
“HW given everyday and .”
ENGWR41

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, a multiple-choice midterm, essay finals, and weekly tests, but do not clearly .

Final EssayMultiple Choice MidtermWeekly QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The .”
ENGLISHWRITING
“The .”
ENGWR300
“2 quizzes and 1 writing assignment a week FOR ONLINE.”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A as long as you do the work. Overall not a bad class or teacher but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Class wasnt hard- but the professor is pretty absent.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“There was so much work for this class.”

⚖️ Grade Value

66/100

“If you're a strong writer, you should have no problem getting an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but isn't so much with .
  • He doesnt really teach, graded every single essay the LAST week of the semester.
  • , and easy to follow.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Easy class but LOTS of filler work.
  • . They weren't active with emails. and essays.
  • He does give out a lot of homework, but it mostly comes out of the textbook so it is easy.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The work was easy for me, but could be challenging for some.
  • Easy A as long as you do the work.
  • Overall easy A hands down. Just attend class and do the homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

98/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years provide detailed and consistent evidence of , and teaching tradeoffs.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 514
3 out of 513
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGWR30015 reviews
ENGWR30211 reviews
ENGWR1015 reviews
ENG1014 reviews
ENGWR3014 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ENG582 reviews
ENGLISHWRITING2 reviews
ENGWR412 reviews
ENGWR582 reviews
ENGL3021 review
ENGWR3001031 review
ENGWRT3021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 3 · A 11 · A- 6

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2