AI Rate Professor

Art

Dilshod Rizam

ART320 · ART321 · ART302 · ART300 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
84.38%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a manageable and following directions usually lead to a strong grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear GradingHelpful FeedbackEasy A With EffortCaringProject Based
  • Most students describe him as , and easy to pass if .
  • The course is usually project based with little or no testing, but and detail matters.
  • Online reviews are positive overall but mention boring demos and some concern about AI art examples.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable if , and put visible effort into the drawings.

Online evidence emphasizes clear modules and no tests, while and project criteria.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course is beginner friendly and clearly demonstrated, but , and self-practice.

Online students describe easy instructions and weekly projects, while and occasional harder drawings.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

demo days and is sometimes directly tied to passing or project progress.

Online has some mandatory Zoom/demo days, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him because , and .

, though online reviews show more complaints about boring demos and AI examples.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

and forgiving when , and communicate, though he can be picky about details.

Format shift

Online reviews stress clear grading and second chances, while and some tough-grader complaints.

Workload

Light

78/100

Work is usually one project per week or every two weeks with few tests or writing tasks, but .

Format shift

Online workload is mostly weekly projects with no reading or tests, while , and occasional quizzes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students consistently praise , and willingness to help, despite a few complaints about dull or rushed demos.

Format shift

, while online students rely more on videos, modules, and Zoom demos.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Grades are driven , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly say there are no tests, while terms-based exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and hands-on demos, but attendance and exact project standards matter more.

Main concern

Attendance and , and a few students found him unfair or unclear.

What students said

“His criticism is very specific and helpful.”
ART300
“ and follow the criteria for an easy A.”
ART320
“ because each drawing will be about 2 weeks and after that, you're on your own.”
ART300

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually found the class organized, easy, and flexible, though a few disliked long demos, AI examples, or strict recreation expectations.

Main concern

Some online students found demos boring or .

What students said

“Do your work, follow instructions and watch the demo videos, it's that easy.”
ART300
“ .”
ART320
“Not impressed with his teaching style and rushed through his classes and demos but expected perfection.”
ART300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears mostly project based, and reviews do not clearly prove a .

No Tests In Many Online SectionsProject Based GradingOccasional QuizzesMidterm And Final Mentioned In Older In-Person Review

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

92/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention mostly projects and a midterm and final in some older sections.

Project Based GradingTwo Quizzes MentionedMidterm And Final Mentioned
“Overall did 9 projects, 2 quizzes, and 1 sketchbook assignment that took some time to do.”
ART320
“Easy A as long as and study for the midterm and .”
ART300

Online

Online reviews clearly describe no reading or submitted art pieces and projects.

No Reading Or TestsProject Based GradingNo Discussions Or Writing Assignments
“ .”
ART320
“Overall, only art pieces get turned in, .”
ART300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and follow the criteria for an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“His criticism is very specific and helpful.”

📈 Easy A Path

88/100

“Do your work, follow instructions and watch the demo videos, it's that easy.”

⚖️

82/100

“ and transparent, with clear rubrics and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and gives lots of examples in mandatory class days.
  • He would walk around the class and .
  • He instructs each and every student individually about their work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and follow the criteria for an easy A.
  • Class was really easy.
  • you will pass if and you study exactly what he tells you to study.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Not impressed with his teaching style and rushed through his classes and demos but expected perfection.
  • Terrible professor. Not done exactly his way? You dont make the grade.
  • Only downside is that he uses some AI images as examples.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 36 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show consistent themes with some dissenting detail.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART30023 reviews
ART32011 reviews
ART3021 review
ART3211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 6 · A 18 · A- 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2