Grant Parker

MUFHL400 · CONCERTBAND · MUSIC300 · BANDTHEORY · MUSICTHER · MUHFL310 · MUSICHISTORY311 · MUFHL321 · MUFHL310 · MUSICHISTORY300 · MUFL310 · MUS300 · MUHFL400 · THEORY1 · MUS400 · MUFHL411 · MUP330 · MUFHL300 · MUSIC · MUFHL311 · MUFHL315 · 58 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 97/100
RMP rating: 4.6/5
Take again: 77.27%
Difficulty: 1.9

The decision

if you want a highly supportive music professor and can tolerate lectures plus required concert-related work.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AExtra Credit HeavyPassionate TeacherAttendance MattersConcert Reports

Students overwhelmingly describe Parker as caring, passionate, and one of their favorite music professors.
Grades are usually very forgiving because of , and .
The main workload issue is required concert attendance, term papers, long lectures, or long online tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Students repeatedly report easy A outcomes because , and if required work is completed.

Online can require more self-management and concert reports, while and direct exam help.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Music history content is usually described as simple and clear, though long lectures and listening recognition can bore or challenge some students.

Online feels heavier because of long videos and tests, while because and explains material live.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and concerts or performances can be required for the .

In-person reviews most clearly describe attendance points, while and required concerts.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students recommend him because , and creates many chances to succeed.

, while online recommendations are positive but tempered by workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

He is extremely grade friendly, with , and reports of students earning A grades with modest effort.

Format shift

and , while online evidence still shows easy grading if all assignments are submitted.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

The class is usually easy but , and sometimes long videos.

Format shift

Online reviews mention long videos and timed tests, while , and papers.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe him as passionate, caring, funny, knowledgeable, and deeply invested in student success.

Format shift

, while online reviews still describe him as caring and helpful.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades combine tests or quizzes with attendance, term papers, concert reports, participation, and .

Format shift

Online sections lean toward tests and written concert work, while in-person , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

preparation, and grade support, with many calling the class an easy A.

Main concern

and concert requirements can affect grades if .

What students said

“The class is set up so that you can get an A, as long as you put in minimal effort.”
MUFHL311

“Tests straightforward.”
MUFHL300

“ but he really cares about the students, you can tell.”
MUHFL310

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are usually easy but , and dependent on completing concert assignments.

Main concern

, and required concert reports can make online feel busier than expected.

What students said

“Tests are 100 questions on the whole section with .”
MUFHL300

“Must turn in .”
MUFHL300

“Overall easy A.”
MUFHL300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student friendly because he reviews material, some tests are online or open book, and .

Online TestsOpen Book MentionedTimed Quizzes MentionedUntimed Final MentionedExam Reviews

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe online, open-book, or heavily reviewed tests, but .

Online TestsOpen Book TestsExam Review SessionsRetakes Mentioned

“ so open book, notes, internet.”
MUFHL300

“He ALWAYS tells you exactly what is going .”
MUFHL321

Online

Online reviews mention timed quizzes or exams, an untimed final, listening portions, and questions that can often be found through study resources, but .

Timed ExamsUntimed FinalListening PortionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

“There's timed exams and an , but all the questions on the .”
MUFHL300

“ and found on quizlet.”
MUFHL300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“The class is set up so that you can get an A, as long as you put in minimal effort.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“One of the .”

📈 Easy A Path

94/100

“The class is set up so that you can get an A, as long as you put in minimal effort.”

⚖️

95/100

“Very fair, plenty of opportunities to raise your grade, Eaaasy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

He is so inspirational, encouraging, and caring.
He loves ehat he does which makes the students love the class.
Very cool professor. jokes a lot and makes the class interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Exams

He goes over the .
There is so much extra cridet that you will get an A .
He allows you to retake any test/quiz that you missed or did not do well on.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload

Required to go to 3 concerts and write 2-page reviews for each one.
Test and and there's a few concerts you must attend for .
Ridiculously amount of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span over two decades and show consistent praise with , and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 545

4 out of 58

3 out of 52

2 out of 52

1 out of 51

Course coverage

MUFHL30020 reviews

MUFHL3215 reviews

MUP3304 reviews

MUFHL3103 reviews

MUFHL4002 reviews

Show 16 more courses

BANDTHEORY1 review

CONCERTBAND1 review

MUFHL3111 review

MUFHL3151 review

MUFHL4111 review

MUFL3101 review

MUHFL3101 review

MUHFL4001 review

MUS3001 review

MUS4001 review

MUSIC1 review

MUSIC3001 review

MUSICHISTORY3001 review

MUSICHISTORY3111 review

MUSICTHER1 review

THEORY11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 7 · A 13

B range

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1

Grant Parker

x x if you want a highly supportive music professor and can tolerate lectures plus required concert-related work.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

WalkInThePark

Introductory

Mandatory

MustTake

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📈 Easy A Path

⚖️ x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Grades And Exams

⚠️ About Workload

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want a highly supportive music professor and can tolerate lectures plus required concert-related work.

⚖️