AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Margaret Parilo

ACCT301 · ACC301 · ACCOUNT301 · ACCT311 · 147 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
77.19%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Take Margaret Parilo if you want a structured accounting class where doing the listed work and usually pays off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly OrganizedExtra Credit HeavyClear GradingPolarizing In PersonTest-Based Structure
  • because the class is organized, predictable, and full of .
  • A smaller but intense negative group reports poor help, rigid policies, and .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Most students say an A , and dropped tests, but missed assessments and weaker teaching fit can hurt badly.

Online reviews are strongly Easy A leaning, while in-person reviews are more split because and withdrawals.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course is usually easy to follow because , but accounting content and .

Online students more often call it easy and predictable, while and unclear lecture support.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

and often known early, but and test windows with little accommodation.

Online evidence shows both advance scheduling and strict quiz windows, while in-person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her for organization, , responsiveness, and clear grading despite a noticeable minority warning against her.

Online reviews are mostly enthusiastic, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, and clear grading make grades forgiving for students who stay on schedule.

Format shift

Online evidence strongly supports leniency, while and harsh exam complaints.

Workload

Light

76/100

The workload is steady with weekly assignments, tests, and reading, but most students call it manageable and predictable.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize planning and manageable weekly work, while in-person reviews .

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Most students praise her organization, responsiveness, and real-world accounting knowledge, though some say she does not teach enough directly.

Format shift

Online students mostly praise structure and access, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The class , and sometimes no comprehensive final.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly assignments and tests, while and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between strong praise for support and sharp criticism of and .

Main concern

, and lecture materials unclear or harsh.

What students said

“There's and .”
ACCT301
“majority of your ”
ACCOUNT301
“ and notes.”
ACCT311

Remote format

Online

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly very positive, emphasizing organization, clear deadlines, , and .

Main concern

Some students say the course is rigid, textbook-dependent, or lacks personal teaching interaction.

What students said

“You know all the due dates when the class begins so there are no surprises ever during the semester.”
ACC301
“I knew exactly what I had to do to get an A.”
ACCT301
“If you miss a up.”
ACCT311

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear predictable and sometimes softened by dropped tests, but quiz and .

Chapter TestsMultiple Choice ExamsNo Comprehensive FinalDropped TestsTimed Quiz Window

Assessment risk

Standard

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Dropped TestsExam-Heavy Grading
“There's and .”
ACCT301
“majority of your ”
ACCOUNT301

Online

Online reviews mention weekly chapter tests, , and strict quiz or test windows in negative reviews.

Chapter TestsMultiple Choice ExamsNo Comprehensive FinalStrict Quiz Window
“She actually gives 3 full days and .”
ACC301
“ and assignments.”
ACCT311
“There is exactly 24 hour given for quizzes.”
ACCOUNT301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great professor. so you know exactly what you have to do to get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching fit; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She is a real CPA and includes a lot of real life experience in her class.”

📈

84/100

“There's and .”

⚠️ Policy Risk

58/100

“If you miss a up.”

Theme 1

🗂️ About Organization

  • and never any surprises.
  • . No surprises.
  • of class and .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • Be sure to do the - it will help your grade.
  • Great class. Easy to understand what is expected. Do the work and you will get an A.
  • Everyone can earn an A in the class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • She is unhelpful and strictly adheres to the syllabus.
  • Very easy to get an A, but you will not learn anything.
  • and notes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

147

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years give rich, consistent themes, with enough negative detail to show real tradeoffs.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5112
4 out of 59
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 524

Course coverage

ACCT31119 reviews
ACCT30112 reviews
ACCOUNT30111 reviews
ACC3018 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

32

A 32

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 7

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 6