Kimberly Williams-Brito

MATH300 · MATH335 · MATH100 · MATH125 · MATH30 · MATH20 · MATH120 · MATH350 · MATH355 · MATH333 · STATS300 · MATH373 · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 46/100
RMP rating: 3.4/5
Take again: 55.32%
Difficulty: 3.1

The decision

Take her only if , and tolerate slow grading or communication gaps.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentDisorganized gradingMath supportHeavy homeworkAttendance issues

Positive reviews praise her as caring, funny, approachable, and helpful for students who struggle with math.
Negative reviews repeatedly cite missed classes, poor communication, slow grading, disorganization, and .
Students can succeed with steady effort, but the experience is inconsistent and much worse in online reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible with , and persistence, but , and inconsistent course management raise the cost.

, while online reviews make the A harder because of skipped classes and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is not easy for many students, and mismatched homework, test-heavy grading, or .

, while online sections are often described as harder because students had to teach themselves.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

because several reviews warn that skipping class hurts success and missed instruction creates major problems.

and asking questions, while online reviews also show that canceled meetings harmed learning.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

54/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format and tolerance for disorganization, because students either call her caring and .

In-person reviews are mixed but often positive, while online reviews are mostly negative and less recommendable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

Some students report fair tests and clear expectations, but , and delayed grades.

Format shift

, while online reviews especially criticize missing or .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Workload , and test prep, with some students calling it overwhelming.

Format shift

and labs, while online reviews sometimes had little homework but suffered from insufficient practice.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is often caring and , but repeated disorganization, absences, slow grading, and online teaching failures reduce the overall experience.

Format shift

, while online teaching is consistently weaker in the comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and finals, with some sections becoming test-heavy or based on few graded items.

Format shift

and finals, while online sections mention tests, labs, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with many praising her care and clarity while , and disorganization.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistency, , and poor communication outside class.

What students said

“She cares for her students and wants them to do well.”
STATS300

“the took”
STATS300

“Missed at least 6 days during the semester.”
MATH350

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing canceled classes, missing grades, weak online teaching, and self-teaching pressure.

Main concern

Online students repeatedly say she does not grade promptly and may cancel or .

What students said

“Took her class online and it was horrible.”
MATH300

“you basically have to teach yourself”
MATH300

“She has no idea what she's doing online.”
MATH300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually standard math tests or finals, though some students say tests are similar to homework while .

Tests Similar To HomeworkFinal ExamTest Heavy In Some SectionsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test prep, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

TestsFinal ExamQuizzesTest Prep

“ .”
STATS300

“There are tests and a final.”
STATS300

“Did not even show up to administer the .”
MATH350

Online

Online reviews mention tests and a final but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

TestsFinal ExamReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

“our final is tomorrow(5/16/21) and she's only graded 1 lab out of 12 and 1 exam out of 3 throughout the whole semester.”
MATH300

“ ”
MATH300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“She will do whatever it takes to help you learn.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She will do whatever it takes to help you learn.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

28/100

“Did not post grades the entire semester and complained about students asking for grades.”

📈 Effort For Grade

52/100

“As long as you keep up with the homework and study for the .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support & Care

She wants her students to succeed.
extra mile to help you.
She really cares about the students and is very cool.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization & Communication

Zero communication.
She is very hard to contact outside of class, especially through email.
Missed at least 6 days during the semester.

Theme 3

📚

.
Assigns A LOT of
the took

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, include both formats, and provide detailed, repeated evidence of both strengths and recurring risks.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525

4 out of 511

3 out of 55

2 out of 512

1 out of 512

Course coverage

STATS30015 reviews

MATH30010 reviews

MATH1007 reviews

math3334 reviews

MATH1253 reviews

Show 7 more courses

MATH203 reviews

MATH1202 reviews

MATH3502 reviews

MATH301 review

MATH3351 review

MATH3551 review

MATH3731 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 4 · A 11 · A- 3

B range

B+ 1 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

C+ 3 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

D 1

F

F 1

No letter grade reported

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5

Kimberly Williams-Brito

Take her only if x x x x x x x x x x, and tolerate slow grading or communication gaps.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Mandatory

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚠️ Organization Risk

📈 Effort For Grade

❤️ About Support & Care

⚠️ About Organization & Communication

📚 x x x x

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Take her only if , and tolerate slow grading or communication gaps.

📚