AI Rate Professor

Sociology

George Nyenbeku

SOC321 · SOC301 · SOCIOLOGY300 · SOC341 · SOC300SOC321 · SOC300 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him only if , and stay ahead of assignments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasSlow Email ResponseEasy If You Keep UpFew Major GradesMixed Lectures
  • Grades , but and few major grades create risk.
  • Online reviews are more negative because students report , and .
  • lectures to complaints about disorganization and self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is often reachable by completing the work, but , and inconsistent grading make it less automatic.

and instruction risk, while in-person evidence more often says the class is easy if students attend and complete work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The sociology content is usually described as manageable, but poor organization and than the material.

Online difficulty comes mostly from Canvas and unclear instructions, while and self-study.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance appears to vary by course, with and others suggesting flexibility.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence, while online reviews do not clearly show a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

workload or engaging style and can tolerate weak organization and communication.

Online reviews are less favorable because of communication and Canvas issues, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grading can be easy for routine work, but essays and a few major assignments are .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews include both easy-grade and tough-grading experiences.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Many students say the workload is light or manageable, but quizzes, essays, readings, and .

Format shift

Online reviews often describe few major assignments, while , and attendance tasks.

Teaching experience

Average

57/100

His teaching is highly inconsistent, with some students praising engaging lectures and others reporting poor preparation, weak communication, and disorganization.

Format shift

Online teaching is hurt by unclear modules and slow replies, while and strongest criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and assignments rather than one clearly dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize essays, quizzes, and few major assignments, while , and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are polarized, with some students praising engaging lectures and others saying the .

Main concern

The and organization.

What students said

“He is the .”
SOC321
“ . Does not teach or engage students.”
SOC300SOC321

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often found the work light or passable but , and weak communication.

Main concern

The biggest online risk is poor organization and limited instructor response.

What students said

“The chapters were actually marked clearly”
SOC321
“Not a lot of work, great teacher. Easy A.”
SOC300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is inconsistent, with some courses using quizzes and online tests, and no clear universal policy.

QuizzesEssaysOnline ExamsTake-Home TestsNo Final Mentioned In One Course

Assessment risk

Varies

57/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, exams, and a final, but they do not clearly prove closed-book or proctored exam rules.

Online TestsTake-Home TestsQuizzesFinal
“All quizzes and .”
SOC300
“ !!”
SOC300

Online

, and one course with , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser policies.

QuizzesEssaysExam Maker AssignmentNo Final Mentioned In One Course
“It is an easy A course, 2 essays, many quizzes, and .”
SOC321
“ , and end”
SOCIOLOGY300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class is awful read the book teach yourself or get another prof”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

57/100

“Professor George is perhaps one of the .”

⚖️

55/100

“Did the assignments as described in the description and got horrible grades.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

48/100

“Cool professor in person, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is the .
  • Does not teach or engage students.
  • His lectures are a bit boring but also entertaining if you get into it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you do your work
  • The writing assignments have no actual guidance or examples pertaining to the assignment
  • what was taught.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • He does not respond to emails quickly so .
  • This was an online class and I never heard from the professor once.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 50 reviews cover many years and courses with rich detail, though opinions are polarized and some older format labels may be imperfect.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 516
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 519

Course coverage

SOC30028 reviews
SOC32111 reviews
SOC3417 reviews
SOC3012 reviews
SOC300SOC3211 review
Show 1 more courses
SOCIOLOGY3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 1 · A 14 · A- 1

B range

16

B+ 9 · B 7

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5