AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Lachanda Davis

PH · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can handle a very heavy workload and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderHeavy WorkloadMany PapersPoor SupportAvoid Online
  • All three reviews rate the class extremely poorly and , and little support.
  • Students report low grades and no recommendation signal, making the course high risk for GPA-sensitive students.
  • The evidence is entirely online, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

4/100

Getting an A appears extremely unlikely because , and .

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

The course feels difficult because students , and lecture-heavy work.

Only online reviews exist, so course easiness cannot be compared by format.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Reviews mention participation but do .

Online reviews mention participation matters, while there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students do not recommend her because they , and .

All recommendation evidence is from online reviews, and it is uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

2/100

Grading appears very harsh because and all reported grades are low.

Format shift

This conclusion comes only from online reviews because there are no in-person reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

3/100

The workload is described as overwhelming, with many assignments, heavy work, and many papers.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

2/100

Teaching experience is rated awful because every comment describes poor support, negative tone, or extreme dissatisfaction.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence is available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize papers, assignments, participation, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are uniformly negative, , and poor support.

Main concern

Students describe heavy work and a high risk of low grades.

What students said

“She gives out so many assignments and they are filled with heavy work.”
PH
“Not helpful and didn't care if you passed or not.”
PH
“She will fail you just because she can”
PH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam format, proctoring, open-book status, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives out so many assignments and they are filled with heavy work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Experience

2/100

“Not helpful and didn't care if you passed or not.”

📚 Workload Pressure

3/100

“She gives out so many assignments and they are filled with heavy work.”

⚖️

2/100

“She will fail you just because she can”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • Really passive aggressive.
  • Not helpful and didn't care if you passed or not.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She gives out so many assignments and they are filled with heavy work.
  • So many papers

Theme 3

📉 About Grades

  • She will fail you just because she can
  • I want to start off by saying that this professor is the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited by only 3 reviews, but the comments are recent and highly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PH3 reviews

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values