AI Rate Professor

Art History

Alice Fellos

ARTH300 · ARTH309 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a supportive art history professor and can handle participation, presentations, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind and HelpfulEasy AFun LecturesParticipation MattersExtra Credit
  • Students consistently describe Fellos as nice, helpful, and enjoyable.
  • In-person classes are usually easy if students attend, participate, and .
  • The online review is positive but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

In-person reviews repeatedly call the class an easy A, but , and the online finals still require real completion effort.

, while the single online review reports more weekly work and two finals.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students describe the classes as introductory, fun, and not too hard, though exams and presentations add some challenge.

In-person reviews make the course sound easier, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

must, especially for participation and exam preparation.

Attendance pressure appears in in-person reviews, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and generally easy to succeed with.

Both formats are positive, but the stronger .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students report easy grades, , and manageable assignments when they complete the expected work.

Format shift

, while but tied to more required work.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload includes notes, journals, , and finals, but most students call it manageable.

Format shift

The online review reports weekly discussion work and two finals, while but usually described as easy.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Every review gives top teaching marks and describes her as nice, fun, helpful, or interesting.

Format shift

Both formats support excellent teaching, though in-person reviews provide more detail.

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Grades appear to come from tests, essays, presentations, journals, participation, discussions, quizzes, and finals.

Format shift

Online assessment includes quizzes, discussion boards, and finals, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and grade-friendly when students attend and , and presentations.

Main concern

, and presentations matter.

What students said

“Prof. Fellos and ARTH300 are an easy A.”
ARTH300
“You will get good grade in her class”
ARTH309
“ provided during lectures that augment the mid-term and final study guides.”
ARTH300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online class is supportive and manageable but , and two finals.

Main concern

The the course.

What students said

“There is a 4 and a time-consuming DB every week, not bad.”
ARTH300
“However, there are 2 finals.”
ARTH300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, a midterm, a final, and two online finals, but .

Two FinalsMidtermFinalTestsStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests, a , and study guides, but do .

Two TestsMidtermFinalStudy Guides
“Two tests, 3 EASY essays and a 5 minute presentation, not too hard.”
ARTH300
“ .”
ARTH309
“ provided during lectures that augment the mid-term and final study guides.”
ARTH300

Online

The online review clearly mentions two finals, including one large cumulative final, but .

Two FinalsLarge Cumulative Final
“However, there are 2 finals.”
ARTH300
“1 is 140pts and is 137 questions from the entire 16weeks.”
ARTH300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Fellos and ARTH300 are an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She's a really fun teacher. Her lectures are always enjoyable.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

88/100

“Prof. Fellos and ARTH300 are an easy A.”

🧾 Workload Reality

62/100

“There is a 4 and a time-consuming DB every week, not bad.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and very willing to help when you need it.
  • She's a really fun teacher. Her lectures are always enjoyable.
  • Fantastic introductory art class.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Effort

  • Prof. Fellos and ARTH300 are an easy A.
  • Do what she ask you to do. You will get good grade in her class
  • But she does offer !

Theme 3

🗣️ About Participation

  • if you don't like public speaking or because theres alot.
  • Don't miss class either or else you'll lose participation.
  • provided during lectures that augment the mid-term and final study guides.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are consistent and positive, but several are old and only one is online.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTH3003 reviews
ARTH3093 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values