AI Rate Professor

Art & Design

Mikko Lautamo

Courses not reported · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Mikko Lautamo for , but be more cautious with online art history if you dislike detailed critique.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStrong FeedbackCaringLenient Late WorkMixed Online Grading
  • and lenient late-work policies.
  • Online reviews are split between excellent lectures and .
  • The course is approachable for beginners, especially in studio-style art work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic in the in-person studio class with steady project work and lenient late policies, but .

, while online evidence is sharply split.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The studio course is beginner-friendly and paced calmly, though art history may require more interest and reading.

In-person reviews emphasize approachability, while and possible struggle.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Comments do not prove a strict attendance rule, but and busy schedules.

In-person reviews mention flexible late work, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and supportive teaching, despite one serious online grading complaint.

, while online reviews are mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, but one online review reports tough, nitpicky grading.

Format shift

Leniency is mainly supported by in-person reviews, while .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

, but the online art history review describes high time cost.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds steady and reasonable, while online workload may be heavier.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students mostly praise knowledgeable lectures, caring support, and .

Format shift

, while online feedback ranges from excellent to frustrating.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on art projects, assignments, critiques, and .

Format shift

Both formats mainly discuss assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently describe a and flexible late-work support.

Main concern

Lectures may help Adobe skills more than broader art development.

What students said

“They were a solid professor who definitely helped me improve my art quite a bit.”
13086
“There is no rush in the class, the late work policy is great and thoughtful to students and busy schedules.”
13086

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

lectures and another reporting heavy effort for weak grades.

Main concern

and demanding.

What students said

“Spent so much time doing work for this class to have a mediocre/bad .”
12059
“The lectures are great. She is energetic and knowledgeable.”
13086

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You don't have to be a !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ and support on art.”

⚖️

72/100

“ , and offers kind but .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“This is a great course. I would jump at the not in my major”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are great. She is energetic and knowledgeable.
  • and support on art.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Spent so much time doing work for this class to have a mediocre/bad .
  • There is no rush in the class, the late work policy is great and thoughtful to students and busy schedules.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews provide useful detail, but the small sample and split online experience limit certainty.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

130864 reviews
120591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 1 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values