AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Jason Edmonds

ANTH310 · ANTH334 · ANTHROPOLOGY301 · ANTH300 · ANTH303 · ANTH301 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
82.35%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Jason Edmonds if you can keep up with lecture-based material and want a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny LecturesExtra CreditLecture HeavyFair GradingExam Dependent
  • Most students praise Jason Edmonds as knowledgeable, funny, and generally fair.
  • Grades can be strong because and .
  • Success depends on attending or , and studying for tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A is very , and fair grading, but exams can still punish weak preparation.

Online reviews show manageable work with open-book evidence, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The content is understandable when he teaches it, but , and specific test answers add real challenge.

Online content sounds clearer and more structured, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but many students say skipping lecture makes passing much harder.

In-person reviews strongly tie success to lecture attendance, while online and notes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most students recommend him for humor, knowledge, fair grading, and , despite some complaints about boring lectures and .

Both formats are mostly positive, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Many reviews mention fair grading, , and easy points, but some students report .

Format shift

Online reviews lean fair and manageable, while .

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Work , and exams, but students often call it manageable with preparation.

Format shift

Online work includes weekly posts, quizzes, exams, and a , while , and tests.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students widely praise his knowledge and humor, though a minority find lectures boring or .

Format shift

Online reviews praise clear videos and modules, while and monotone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades often depend heavily on exams and quizzes, with , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, exams, discussions, and a , while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a funny, knowledgeable professor with lecture-heavy classes, , and sometimes tricky or harsh exams.

Main concern

Tests can be hard or specific, especially if .

What students said

“his class is an easy A even if you fail the midterm”
ANTH310
“ and he .”
ANTH300

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews mostly praise clear , and manageable work, though exams and .

Main concern

unless .

What students said

“Dude grades fairly.”
ANTH303
“You wont pass the class if you dont read and study for the exam.”
ANTH301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style varies by course, with online open-book evidence but difficult.

Open Book Online EvidenceLecture-Based ExamsStudy GuidesTricky TestsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support lecture-based exams, study guides, multiple choice or short answer tests, and some tricky or .

Lecture-Based ExamsStudy GuideMultiple ChoiceShort AnswerTricky Tests
“The .”
ANTH300
“ .”
ANTH301

Online

Online reviews support lecture-based quizzes and exams, including one open-book course, but .

Open BookWeekly QuizzesFinal ExamLecture-Based Exams
“everything is open book”
ANTH300
“Weekly quizzes were 15 points; final exam worth 70 points.”
ANTH334

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He really knows the material and makes it easy to understand.”

📈 Easy A Potential

78/100

“I probably averaged a C- in the test category but still got an A.... !!!!!!!!!!!!”

📝

68/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really knows the material and makes it easy to understand.
  • Not sure why people call him boring because he is HILARIOUS.
  • Hes very monotone and its really hard to pay attention to him lecturing early in the morning.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Dude grades fairly.
  • Tons of and .
  • and he .

Theme 3

📝

  • You wont pass the class if you dont read and study for the exam.
  • All of the quizzes and posted and Galapagos.
  • He always prepares a solid study guide for the exam.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years and both formats give rich, mostly consistent evidence with some meaningful dissent.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH3016 reviews
ANTH3005 reviews
ANTH3103 reviews
ANTH3031 review
ANTH3341 review
Show 1 more courses
ANTHROPOLOGY3011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1