AI Rate Professor

English

Erica Reeves

ENGWR58 · ENGCW420 · ENGR310 · ENG300 · ENGWR301 · ENGLISH58 · ENGRW58 · ENGW300 · ENGWR109 · ENGWR300 · 79 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
67.57%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take her if you want structured writing help and feedback, but if you dislike participation or .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDetailed feedbackParticipation mattersTough gradingCaring but polarizingWriting-heavy
  • , and ability to improve writing.
  • The biggest and required participation, especially in in-person classes.
  • Online reviews are mostly positive and flexible, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic with , and revisions, but and writing volume require steady effort.

Online reviews make the A path sound clearer and more flexible, while and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course is structured and often beginner-friendly, but , and rigid formats keep it from being effortless.

Online courses feel more manageable, while and structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and participation matter, and missing class or being late can hurt the grade.

In-person , while online reviews focus more on due-date flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and support, but the strong minority of harsh grading complaints creates real caution.

Online reviews are more consistently positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

She gives feedback, rewrites, and , but many students still call her a tough or .

Format shift

Online grading sounds fairer and more flexible, while .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload , and participation, with some students calling it heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers and reading but spaced due dates, while and participation pressure.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students , and energy, but some describe her style as rude, restrictive, or formulaic.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews repeatedly describe essays, drafts, journals, reading quizzes, discussions, portfolios, and .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-focused, with online reviews emphasizing portfolios and papers and and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are polarized, praising her care and feedback while , and rigid writing rules.

Main concern

, and participation can heavily affect the grade and class experience.

What students said

“Gives back a ton of ”
ENGWR301
“YOU MUST GO TO EVERY CLASS MEETING OR ELSE YOU WILL FAIL.”
58

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly describe fair grading, strong feedback, spaced due dates, , and a manageable but writing-heavy workload.

Main concern

The online workload can feel like busy work if you dislike structured writing and reading.

What students said

“It's a very easy class as long as you keep up with the work.”
ENGWR300
“Being a procrastinator, I did struggle with the work load”
ENGWR301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears mostly paper, portfolio, project, and are no traditional tests.

No TestsEssay-Based FinalPortfolio FinalReading Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sections, with essays, projects, quizzes, and participation replacing exams.

No TestsEssay-Based FinalReading Quizzes
“There's no tests, only 2 papers based on novels read in class, and .”
ENGWR301
“ . 3 essay assignments and 1 research paper in lieu of a final.”
ENGWR300

Online

Online reviews mention final portfolios, papers, discussions, and workshops, but .

Final PortfolioPapersDiscussions
“There's a ”
ENGCW420
“There are going to be a lot of papers (4 in total)”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives very respectful and and she has no problem helping you be the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting teaching support, grading strictness, participation demands, and assignment structure. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She gives very respectful and and she has no problem helping you be the !”

⚖️

48/100

“ , and makes her class interesting and engaging. She is also very fair in grading.”

📌

18/100

“YOU MUST GO TO EVERY CLASS MEETING OR ELSE YOU WILL FAIL.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Reeves is a great professor with a good heart.
  • She always responds very promptly and .
  • She makes her lectures easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She can be a but it's only to benefit you in the end.
  • It's a very easy class as long as you keep up with the work.

Theme 3

📝 About Writing Work

  • There are going to be a lot of papers (4 in total) that you must complete
  • No real freedom with writing.
  • Gives back a ton of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

79

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give rich, detailed, and format-specific evidence, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 549
4 out of 515
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ENGWR30014 reviews
ENGWR30111 reviews
ENGWR589 reviews
ENGRW584 reviews
ENG3003 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENGCW4202 reviews
ENGR3102 reviews
ENGW3002 reviews
581 review
ENGLISH581 review
ENGWR1091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 4 · A 8 · A- 3

B range

13

B+ 2 · B 11

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1