AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Eric Anderson

ENGR312 · ENGR420 · ENGR412ENGR400 · ENGINEERING412 · ENGINEERING312 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can handle a flipped or self-guided class and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLenient gradingProject and group workHelpful but uneven teachingSelf-study neededImproved over time
  • Recent reviews are much stronger than older ones and describe him as kind, helpful, and lenient.
  • The class is often easy or manageable, but students may need to learn from slides, textbooks, YouTube, or pre-recorded lectures.
  • Negative reviews , and harsh grading in earlier offerings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Recent reviews repeatedly describe easy , and A-level grades with participation or self-study.

Online evidence is mixed, while recent classes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Many students say the class is not hard, but the flipped structure can .

Online evidence is inconsistent, while manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

68/100

Attendance and participation help, but at least one student says they missed much of class and still earned an A.

Attendance evidence mainly comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

He is recommended for leniency and kindness, but not universally because some .

Online reviews conflict, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Recent comments emphasize , and no curveballs.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is mixed, while .

Workload

Light

78/100

Many , and little lecturing, though one online review reports too many assignments.

Format shift

Online workload is split, while .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students often find him kind and helpful, but many also .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment includes projects, homework, , and a final depending on course.

Format shift

Online reviews mention notes on exams and group quizzes, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews, especially recent ones, describe an but limited lecturing.

Main concern

Students wanting detailed traditional lectures may find the teaching too brief or confusing.

What students said

“ and almost always accepts late work (even weeks late).”
ENGR312
“Very little lecturing.”
ENGR312
“Class was not hard.”
ENGR312

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews conflict sharply, with one praising organization and and one criticizing disorganization and excessive assignments.

Main concern

Online experience appears inconsistent and depends heavily on course setup.

What students said

“ .”
ENGR420
“ and ”
ENGR312

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

as take-home quizzes, notes allowed on Zoom exams, fair exams, and partial credit.

Take-Home QuizzesNotes Allowed On Zoom ExamsFair ExamsPartial CreditNo Curveballs

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence , and easy exams, but does not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policy.

Take-Home QuizzesFair ExamsPartial CreditEasy Exams
“ and homework (2-5 problems) after every lecture.”
ENGR420
“ and .”
ENGINEERING412
“ .”
ENGR312

Online

Online evidence explicitly supports notes allowed on Zoom exams, but does not .

Notes Allowed On Zoom ExamsGroup Quizzes
“ .”
ENGR420
“saving class time for review, questions, and group quizzes.”
ENGR420

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Disregard older reviews because he was new as a professor and has massively overhauled his teaching style.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and understandable.”

💸

88/100

“ and almost always accepts late work (even weeks late).”

📚

74/100

“Not very hard, but you will need to study by yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Reverse classroom experience where lectures were watched before class, then work done as a group in class.
  • Very little lecturing.
  • and dry and when he did and solve them wrong.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Class was not hard.
  • and prep for .
  • and .

Theme 3

💻 About Format

  • Most of his .
  • After taking this class I change my major, this professor and assignments.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews cover multiple years and formats, with a praise.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGR3128 reviews
ENGINEERING3124 reviews
ENGINEERING4122 reviews
ENGR412ENGR4002 reviews
ENGR4202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 5

B range

1

B- 1

C range

3

C+ 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1