AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Matthew Nelsenador

MATH341 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can learn independently under a strict workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNot recommendedTough graderHeavy homeworkPoor question supportTest heavy
  • because they describe rude or dismissive responses to questions.
  • The course requires steady work with , and frequent due dates.
  • A passing grade is possible for self-sufficient students, but the support level is low and withdrawals are common in the sample.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades appear possible only with consistent studying and timely work, while , and poor support make an A costly.

The online evidence is only one negative review, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

The math content may be understandable during lecture, but students say he expects prior understanding and .

Online evidence does not clarify content difficulty, while keep up.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and constant participation matter because , and due dates happen nearly every class session.

In-person evidence supports strict attendance pressure, while the single .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students almost unanimously advise against taking him because of , and weak help with questions.

Both formats are negative, with the single online review especially direct and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students call him a and no-nonsense, with several withdrawals and no positive grade-flexibility comments.

Format shift

, while the online review also tags him as a .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students , and something due nearly every class session.

Format shift

Both formats have lots-of-homework tags, but .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most students say he is rude, unwilling to teach, and poor at answering questions despite knowing the subject.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on belittling students, while students ask again.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and tests rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

, and tests, while online evidence only supports a test-heavy tag.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a no-nonsense, homework-heavy course with poor support for .

Main concern

Students report , and unhelpful answers to questions.

What students said

“He is very unwilling to teach and expects you to already know the material.”
MATH341
“Something is due at nearly every class session which is slightly overwhelming.”
MATH341
“he doesn't answer questions well.”
MATH341

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and focuses on rude treatment and lack of teaching support.

Main concern

The main concern is feeling belittled when asking questions.

What students said

“Teachers are supposed to teach, not belittle students.”
MATH341

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews confirm tests are important, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Test HeavyGraded By Few Things

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as a , but do not clearly prove exam policy or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyHomework And Tests
“He does a " and tests so that's all you're graded on.”
MATH341

Online

The online review only supports that the class is test heavy and .

Test Heavy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“He is very unwilling to teach and expects you to already know the material.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“Something is due at nearly every class session which is slightly overwhelming.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a good instructor but a bad teacher.
  • Teachers are supposed to teach, not belittle students.
  • He will answer your questions but if you dont understand and ask again he would started giving attitude.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !
  • Pretty no-nonsense with grading
  • if you study the book and lecture notes and turn everything in on time, you should be good.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • !
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is moderately credible because there are only 7 reviews, but they are consistent across several years and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH3417 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 3