AI Rate Professor

English

Kimberly Limon

ENGWR302 · ENGL0001A · ENGWR300 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
21.43%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you can handle a , and frequent participation requirements.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy writing workloadTough graderLots of homeworkGood feedback sometimesStrict attendance or participation
  • Students consistently describe a heavy writing workload with , and strict word-count expectations.
  • Grades can be high, especially online, but students repeatedly say the A requires major effort and careful writing.
  • Teaching reviews are polarized, with some praising feedback and organization while , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

High grades are possible, but students repeatedly say they earned them through heavy writing, strict formatting, and sustained effort rather than an easy path.

Online reviews include more A grades and some easy-grading comments, while and more frustration.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The writing topics may be manageable, but the workload, word counts, essays, and .

Online content is often described as easy but time-consuming, while and stricter classroom pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Reviews show participation and punished socially or practically.

In-person reviews mention class attendance pressure directly, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

27/100

Most students warn against the class because the workload and though a and dedication.

Online reviews are mixed but workload-heavy, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or nitpicky grader, especially on spelling, grammar, punctuation, word count, and essay quality.

Format shift

Online reviews include one comment that she grades easy if effort is shown, but both .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Reviews repeatedly cite weekly , and excessive work for the course credit or timeline.

Format shift

Online workload is especially intense in 8-week sections, while as excessive and hard to balance.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Teaching is polarized, with some students praising feedback and dedication but , and poor support.

Format shift

Online students report and email support, while in-person students report more negative experiences with strictness and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Assessment appears , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, with online reviews providing the clearest recurring structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more negative overall and , and unclear or nitpicky expectations.

Main concern

Students struggle with , and .

What students said

“The workload , and the time commitment far outweighs the credit value.”
ENGWR302
“word count matters to the exact number which is very annoying.”
ENGWR300
“She's a so beware, and there is lots of homework”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews show heavy weekly writing and and organization but many warning against the workload.

Main concern

The main concern is an intense writing workload in compressed online sections.

What students said

“Excessive amounts of work per week”
ENGWR302
“She assigns a lot of work, but grades easy.”
ENGWR300
“she was always super fast and .”
ENGL0001A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on writing assignments and do not clearly prove any exam .

No Clear Exam PolicyWriting-Assignment Focus

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and essays, but do not clearly prove any exam policy.

Writing-Assignment FocusNo Clear Exam Policy
“ and journals with a minimum work requirement.”
ENGWR300
“I worked ”
ENGWR300

Online

Online reviews discuss discussion boards, journals, and essays, but do .

Writing-Assignment FocusNo Clear Exam Policy
“ , and 4 essays.”
ENGWR300
“there are 4 major essays”
ENGWR302

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The workload , and the time commitment far outweighs the credit value.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Intensity

12/100

“Excessive amounts of work per week”

⚖️

26/100

“Make sure you have correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation since she is a .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“I personally had a great experience with her.”

Theme 1

📝 About Writing Workload

  • There are 2 500 word discussion boards and 1 journal each week and 4 essays in the semester.
  • The first discussion board is a 500 word post minimum, with two required responses at a minimum of 250 words each.
  • The and were given within close proximity of each other

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Effort

  • I got an A because I worked really hard for it so, its not an easy A.
  • word count matters to the exact number which is very annoying.
  • I worked and even spent hours editing only to receive a .

Theme 3

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She challenges me to be even better.
  • she was always super fast and .
  • She is extremely rude, does not help with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 14 reviews span both formats and multiple years, with strong consistency about workload and .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENGWR3008 reviews
ENGWR3024 reviews
ENGL0001A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1