AI Rate Professor

English

Cicely Young

ENGLISH300 · ENGWR300 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take Young if , and class discussion, but if you need fast communication or highly structured lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWriting heavyGood feedbackDiscussion basedSlow communicationMixed clarity
  • Students often praise Young for , and discussion-based learning.
  • The class is writing and and participation.
  • Negative reviews , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A strong grade is realistic if , and ask for help before deadlines.

Online reviews frame the A as work-based, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The writing level is not usually described as technically hard, but , and critical thinking add friction.

Online students emphasize manageable work, while and discussions.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Participation and showing up matter in several reviews, but one in-person review .

online reviews only implying participation matters.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Most and care, but repeated complaints about communication and clarity keep recommendations mixed.

Online reviews are more consistently positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students describe grading as fair and sometimes easy, though a few call her harsh or confusing.

Format shift

Online reviews mention fair but sometimes harsh grading; and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload , and discussions.

Format shift

Both formats mention reading and presentations and attendance.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

She is often caring and knowledgeable, but , and weak email response hurt the experience.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews show stronger disagreement about teaching clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades appear , and discussion rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and care while others criticize quiet teaching and poor email response.

Main concern

Students who need clear prompts, audible lectures, or .

What students said

“She doesn't answer her emails at all, which is why it's important to gain clarification in class.”
ENGWR300
“Lots of of course.”
ENGWR300
“Easy A, as long as you try.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive, with and manageable work if students start early.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“It was not hard if you put in work.”
ENGWR300
“Good professor, takes a while and but always fair.”
ENGWR300
“Be ready to read. If you a slow reader start early.”
ENGWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment is mainly essay and participation based.

EssaysQuizzesPresentations

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and presentations, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, or open-book rules.

Four EssaysQuizzesClass Presentations
“Criteria is 4 essays with other reading and .”
ENGWR300
“Be prepared for class presentations!”
ENGWR300
“There is a novel you have to read towards the end of the term and 3 quizzes that pertain to it.”
ENGWR300

Online

Online reviews mention papers, assignments, and reading, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, or open-book rules.

PapersReading Assignments
“The assignments we did for example, included a writing prompts.”
ENGWR300
“ and where you need to improve.”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up, do your work, and participate you will do well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and communication; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She's very knowledgeable about the subject, and provides assistance when you ask her.”

📚 Workload

48/100

“Lots of of course.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

70/100

“Professor Young is definitely a professor you should select for English 300.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She's quite quiet.
  • She basically shows powerpoint slides and read from them and you .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was not hard if you put in work.
  • Easy A, as long as you try.
  • You have to be willing to put in the effort if you want an A.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • She doesn't answer her emails at all, which is why it's important to gain clarification in class.
  • , but you can ask her questions.
  • She doesn't reply to emails and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across many years provide detailed and consistent themes, though older reviews reduce current certainty slightly.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGWR30019 reviews
ENGLISH3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3