AI Rate Professor

English

David Weinshilboum

ENGL300 · ENG301 · ENGWR301 · ENG300 · ENWR300 · ENGW300 · ENGWR300 · 216 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an engaging English professor who makes writing less intimidating while still expecting steady effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious lecturerCaring and accessibleStrong writing feedbackExtra credit opportunitiesSome reading and essays
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as funny, caring, and .
  • The course is approachable, but , and .
  • and supportive feedback make strong grades very attainable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

A high grade is very realistic because of , and clear expectations, but essays and .

Online and in-person reviews both support an easy A path, with and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students often call the class easy to handle because and enjoyable, though reading and writing assignments keep it from being effortless.

Online reviews describe minimal work, while but active writing class.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

, and participation, but strict mandatory attendance is not consistently shown.

and success, while online reviews do not show strict attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

99/100

Students recommend him with unusual enthusiasm because , and effective at building writing confidence.

and richer evidence from in-person classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, but , and effort-based support make outcomes forgiving.

Format shift

Online reviews sound slightly more lenient, while but .

Workload

Light

74/100

The workload is usually manageable, with essays, readings, quizzes, and occasional group work rather than overwhelming volume.

Format shift

Online reviews describe minimal work, while and class participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students repeatedly describe him as , and one of .

Format shift

Both formats praise the teaching, with impact.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, reading quizzes, presentations, discussion, and .

Format shift

and quizzes, with little clear evidence of traditional exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are extremely enthusiastic, , and confidence-building instruction.

Main concern

Several students say he can grade writing tough and , and effort.

What students said

“He's honestly an outstanding teacher.”
ENG301
“ if you want to be eligible to receive all the he offers.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are strongly positive, with , and engaging structure.

Main concern

Online reviews mention reading, pop quizzes, and .

What students said

“ and the work was very minimal. Only 3 essays and .”
ENGWR300
“He's .”
ENWR300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and the course appears mostly assignment-based with occasional quizzes and .

Pop QuizzesPossible Final ExemptionAssignment-Focused Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or final policies.

Pop QuizzesPossible Final Exemption
“If you only miss 1 class and have an A, you can get exempt from the final!”
ENGWR300
“Get ready to read a novel and !”
ENG301

Online

Online reviews mention pop quizzes and assignments, but do not clearly .

Pop QuizzesReading Assignments
“The class has reading assignments and pop quizzes”
ENG301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's honestly an outstanding teacher. He's so funny that you don't even realize he's teaching while being funny, but it completely sticks to your brain.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“His lectures are easy to follow.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

99/100

“TAKE HIS CLASS!!!”

⚖️

78/100

“He can grade a little hard when it comes to some of the assignments and essays.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's so funny that you don't even realize he's teaching while being funny, but it completely sticks to your brain.
  • His , and short.
  • He creates an open and fun classroom learning environment.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Great lectures, great personality, opportunities, and just a great guy in general.
  • You have to put a good amount of effort in his writing to get the grade you wanted.
  • Pretty easy class with lots and lots of opportunities.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He really cares about his students.
  • He was willing to work with me to make sure I get the most out of this class and that I wouldn't fall behind.
  • He works really well with kids who have adaptation plans.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

216

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is highly credible because 50 reviews span many years and show very consistent praise with detailed comments.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5182
4 out of 521
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG30115 reviews
ENG30014 reviews
ENGWR3019 reviews
ENGWR3008 reviews
ENWR3002 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGL3001 review
ENGW3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 3 · A 23 · A- 3

B range

11

B+ 5 · B 6

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1