AI Rate Professor

English

Heather Hutcheson

ENGWR302 · CW400 · ENG302 · ENG301 · ENGWR301 · ENG300 · ENGCW400 · ENGW300 · ENGWR300 · 131 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
66.15%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her only if you want intensive writing practice and , and detailed criticism.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy writing workloadDetailed feedbackTough and nitpicky gradingStructured online classesPolarizing experience
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who value her feedback and .
  • The workload is consistently writing-heavy, especially in online and accelerated courses.
  • Getting an A is possible, but it often requires following detailed instructions, revising, and accepting frequent critique.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A is possible and common, but students repeatedly say it requires steady writing, precise formatting, revisions, and .

Online evidence is more polarized and often harsher, while but somewhat more support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content is not usually described as conceptually impossible, but the fast pace, writing volume, and strict expectations make the course demanding.

Online reviews emphasize weekly writing volume and 8-week pressure, while , and quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

Online sections often appear asynchronous or flexible, but reviews .

Online reviews mention asynchronous work and no meetings, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

53/100

She is worth it for students , but many students strongly advise avoiding her because of workload and .

Online reviews are more sharply divided and recently more negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

31/100

Many students call her a , although and effort can still lead to high grades.

Format shift

Online reviews contain the strongest strict-grading complaints, while .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

The workload is consistently heavy, with , and weekly writing tasks.

Format shift

Online reviews often describe several assignments per week, while , and fast pacing.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Her teaching is polarizing because , but others find her tone, rigidity, and workload damaging.

Format shift

Online reviews show the widest split, while and severe dissatisfaction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment is dominated by essays, journals, peer reviews, discussions, and .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with online reviews providing the clearest recurring weekly assignment pattern.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are also mixed, with strong praise for support and feedback but , and stress.

Main concern

numerous and grading can feel harsh or rigid.

What students said

“Its super time consuming and stressful.”
ENG301
“She wants the and is always there to help with anything.”
ENGWR301

Remote format

Online

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mixed, with many praising structure and feedback but many recent students warning , and discouraging comments.

Main concern

The main online concern is heavy weekly writing paired with .

What students said

“Massive amount of homework and papers.”
ENGWR301
“Always provided .”
ENGCW400

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment appears mainly writing-based with occasional quizzes and .

Writing AssignmentsWeekly JournalsQuizzesEasy Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

61/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention weekly quizzes, journals, essays, and , but do .

Weekly QuizzesJournalsEssaysNo Hard Tests Mentioned
“There will be a lot of reading, quiz every week, 250 word journal every week.”
ENG300
“no presentation or ”
ENG302

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes, journals, essays, peer review, and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

QuizzesWeekly JournalsEssaysEasy Final Mentioned
“Quizzes are sometimes tough, only 15 minutes and can only answer one question at a time.”
ENGWR302
“We had 5 essays and 10 journal assignments along with a first day.”
ENGWR300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and ! She does assign a lot of work, though, so be prepared for that.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation split. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Workload Reality

24/100

“Tons of assignments (around 6 per week including an essay normally).”

⚖️

31/100

“She is a and is extremely nit picky when it comes to formatting.”

🎯 Teaching Split

62/100

“She always provides plenty of constructive feedback on assignments and .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Be prepared to write...A LOT.
  • There were 3 assignments due every week, a poem, a narrative, and .
  • Its super time consuming and stressful.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • She is an from your writing.
  • She graded according to the level of the class, instead of the level that she is at.
  • as long as you follow the instructions given out.

Theme 3

💬 And Support

  • Always provided .
  • She wants the and is always there to help with anything.
  • The and more discouraging until you eventually .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

131

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is highly credible because 50 detailed reviews across online and in-person formats show consistent workload themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 580
4 out of 519
3 out of 514
2 out of 56
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENGCW40010 reviews
ENGWR3009 reviews
ENGWR3018 reviews
ENG3016 reviews
ENGWR3026 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG3004 reviews
ENG3024 reviews
CW4002 reviews
ENGW3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 7 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 2 · B 6 · B- 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 8